Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Torts I01:14

Torts I

Torts in nursing are wrongful acts that can harm patients and potentially lead to civil liability for the involved nurse. These wrongful acts range from unintentional errors to deliberate actions. Depending on the nature and severity of the tort, a nurse found liable may face financial penalties or disciplinary actions. Understanding the distinctions between intentional, quasi-intentional, and unintentional torts is crucial for nurses to mitigate risks and provide safe patient care.
Intentional...
Torts III01:26

Torts III

Types of Quasi-intentional Torts in Healthcare
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts II01:13

Torts II

Intentional torts in healthcare refer to deliberate actions that cause harm or infringe on the rights of others. Understanding these torts is crucial for healthcare professionals to avoid legal liabilities and maintain ethical standards in patient care.
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II01:23

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

Establishing a secure, collaborative nurse-patient relationship is crucial for delivering high-quality care. This relationship, founded on trust, respect, and honesty, enhances the patient's comfort and willingness to share vital health information. For example, a nurse who listens actively and without judgment provides clear information about health conditions and treatment options and respects patient decisions, which builds a trusting relationship.
Communication between nurses and patients...
Ethical Standards II01:23

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Trends in Newborn Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination-Reply.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Pediatric Influenza Vaccination Efficacy.

JAMA pediatrics·2026
Same author

Rates of Leucovorin Prescriptions for Children With Autism.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Suicide Mortality Among Adolescents and Young Adults After Launch of a Suicide and Crisis Lifeline.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Association of Speed Camera Enforcement With Motor Vehicle Crash Injuries.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

US Newborn Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination Rates.

JAMA·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.

Anupam B Jena1, Seth Seabury, Darius Lakdawalla

  • 1Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

The New England Journal of Medicine
|August 19, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians face a high risk of malpractice claims throughout their careers, with nearly all in high-risk specialties likely to be sued. Most claims do not result in payments, but risks and costs vary significantly by medical specialty.

More Related Videos

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
12:10

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Published on: May 19, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Medical Malpractice
  • Physician Risk Assessment
  • Healthcare Economics

Background:

  • Limited data exists on annual malpractice claims, claim costs, and cumulative career risks for physicians by specialty.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for risk management and professional liability assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify the annual proportion of physicians facing malpractice claims.
  • To determine the proportion of claims resulting in indemnity payments and their financial size.
  • To estimate the cumulative career risk of malpractice claims across different medical specialties.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of malpractice data from 1991-2005 for over 40,000 physicians covered by a large insurer.
  • Reporting on claim frequency, payment rates, and indemnity payment sizes for 25 specialties.
  • Estimation of cumulative risk of being sued by age 65 for high- and low-risk specialties.

Main Results:

  • Annually, 7.4% of physicians faced a malpractice claim, with 1.6% resulting in payment; 78% of claims did not lead to payments.
  • Annual claim rates varied widely, from 19.1% in neurosurgery to 2.6% in psychiatry.
  • By age 65, cumulative risk reached 75% in low-risk and 99% in high-risk specialties, with mean indemnity payments of $274,887.

Conclusions:

  • Significant variation exists in malpractice claim likelihood and payment amounts across medical specialties.
  • The cumulative risk of facing a malpractice claim is substantial for all physicians.
  • While most malpractice claims do not result in payments, the overall risk and financial implications necessitate careful consideration within medical practice.