Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with minimal heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Selcuk Adabag1, Henri Roukoz, Inder S Anand
1Division of Cardiology, Veterans Administration Medical Center, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. adaba001@umn.edu
Insights
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) significantly reduces mortality and hospitalizations in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction. While beneficial for NYHA class I/II HF, careful risk-benefit assessment is needed for asymptomatic patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Medical Device Therapy
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality.
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has demonstrated benefits in advanced HF.
- Emerging evidence suggests CRT may also benefit patients with milder HF symptoms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized clinical trials comparing CRT and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
- To evaluate the efficacy of CRT versus ICD in patients with reduced ejection fraction, prolonged QRS interval, and NYHA class I-II HF.
Main Methods:
- Meta-analysis of 5 prospective randomized clinical trials.
- Inclusion of 4,317 patients with NYHA functional class I/II heart failure.
- Comparison of outcomes between CRT and ICD groups.
Main Results:
- CRT significantly reduced all-cause mortality (8% vs. 11.5%) and HF hospitalizations (11.6% vs. 18.2%) compared to ICD.
- CRT led to greater improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV volume.
- In NYHA class II patients, CRT significantly lowered mortality and HF hospitalizations.
- In NYHA class I patients, CRT reduced HF hospitalization risk but not mortality.
Conclusions:
- CRT is effective in decreasing all-cause mortality, reducing HF hospitalizations, and improving LVEF in NYHA class I-II HF patients.
- The benefits of CRT in asymptomatic (NYHA class I) HF patients, particularly regarding hospitalization reduction, warrant careful consideration of risks versus benefits.
Objectives:
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) versus implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF), prolonged QRS interval, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I to II heart failure (HF).
Background:
In patients with advanced HF, CRT improves left ventricular (LV) function and reduces mortality and hospitalizations. Recent data suggest that patients with milder HF also benefit from CRT.
Methods:
A meta-analysis of 5 clinical trials including 4,317 patients with NYHA functional class I/II HF was performed.
Results:
Average age of patients was 65 years, and 80% were male. Frequency of all-cause mortality for CRT versus ICD was 8% versus 11.5% (risk ratio [RR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65 to 0.99, p = 0.04); for HF hospitalization, it was 11.6% versus 18.2% (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.79, p < 0.001). Patients assigned to CRT had a significantly greater improvement in LVEF (+5.9% vs. +2.2%, p < 0.001) and LV volume than ICD patients. Among mildly symptomatic (NYHA functional class II) patients, CRT was associated with significantly lower mortality and HF hospitalization (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.83), p < 0.001). In asymptomatic (NYHA functional class I) patients, HF hospitalization risk was lower (RR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.97, p = 0.04) with CRT; however, there was no difference in mortality. Twelve asymptomatic HF patients needed to be treated with CRT to prevent 1 hospitalization.
Conclusions:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy decreases all-cause mortality, reduces HF hospitalizations, and improves LVEF in NYHA functional class I/II HF patients. Although there was a reduction in HF hospitalization with CRT for asymptomatic (NYHA functional class I) patients, risks versus benefits have to be carefully considered in this subgroup.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

