Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 30, 2026

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment of the tibial component in the Triathlon knee
James P Cashman1, Fiona L Carty, Keith Synnott
1Department of Orthopaedics, Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 13, Ireland. james.cashman@gmail.com
Background:
Long term survivorship in total knee arthroplasty is significantly dependant on prosthesis alignment. Our aim was determine which alignment guide was more accurate in positioning of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. We also aimed to assess whether there was any difference in short term patient outcome.
Method:
A comparison of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment jig was performed. Radiological alignment of tibial components and patient outcomes of 103 Triathlon total knee arthroplasties were analysed.
Results:
Use of the intramedullary was found to be significantly more accurate in determining coronal alignment (p = 0.02) while use of the extramedullary jig was found to give more accurate results in sagittal alignment (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in WOMAC or SF-36 at six months.
Conclusion:
Use of an intramedullary jig is preferable for positioning of the tibial component using this knee system.
Related Concept Videos
Bones of the Lower Limb: Femur and Patella
Knee Joint
A total of seven ligaments support the knee joint. The patellar ligament, which is also attached to the quadriceps femoris group...
Bones of the Lower Limb: Tibia and Fibula
