Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sensory Modalities01:15

Sensory Modalities

Sensation typically is the process by which the sensory receptors and sense organs detect stimuli from the internal and external environment and transmit this information to the central nervous system for processing.
General senses refer to the broad category of sensory information detected by receptors in the body and can be further grouped into somatic and visceral senses. Somatic sensations include touch, pressure, temperature, and pain and are essential for navigating our environment and...
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems01:22

Multi-input and Multi-variable systems

Cruise control systems in cars are designed as multi-input systems to maintain a driver's desired speed while compensating for external disturbances such as changes in terrain. The block diagram for a cruise control system typically includes two main inputs: the desired speed set by the driver and any external disturbances, such as the incline of the road. By adjusting the engine throttle, the system maintains the vehicle's speed as close to the desired value as possible.
In the absence of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contrasting cognitive control in the Simon and spatial Stroop tasks regarding their interference with the control of standing balance.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Exploring age-related inhibitory deficits in auditory attention: Evidence from attention switching.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Visual-manual response selection produces dual-task interference in auditory-verbal memory encoding.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Opposite effects of interruption frequency on performance in interrupted and uninterrupted multistep task.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Huh, what did they say again? The influence of task interruption position and workload on auditory-verbal memory performance.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Dissociating Task Selection and Response Selection in Dual-Task Contexts: Evidence from a Novel Trial-by-Trial Analysis of Temporal Overlap between Tasks.

Journal of cognition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

The role of input-output modality compatibility in task switching.

Denise Nadine Stephan1, Iring Koch

  • 1Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17-19, 52066 Aachen, Germany. stephan@psych.rwth-aachen.de

Psychological Research
|August 23, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Input-output (I-O) modality compatibility impacts task switching, even without dimensional overlap (DO). Modality influences on task switching occur at modality-specific processing pathways, not just specific response codes.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
10:09

Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies

Published on: September 22, 2014

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Human-computer interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Input-output (I-O) modality compatibility concerns the congruence between stimulus and response modalities.
  • Previous research linked I-O incompatibility to higher task switching costs, potentially due to dimensional overlap (DO).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the specific influence of dimensional overlap (DO) on I-O modality compatibility effects in task switching.
  • To determine if I-O modality compatibility impacts task switching independently of DO.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments were conducted to assess task switching performance.
  • Participants completed tasks varying in I-O modality compatibility and the presence or absence of DO.

Main Results:

  • I-O modality compatibility significantly affected task switching, even in the absence of DO.
  • Tasks without DO exhibited even greater modality influences on task switching.

Conclusions:

  • I-O modality compatibility influences response selection by modulating cross-talk between tasks.
  • These effects operate at the level of modality-specific processing pathways, rather than solely on specific response codes.