Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 30, 2026

Step By Step: Microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models
05:25

Step By Step: Microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models

Published on: May 9, 2015

Microsurgery and telemicrosurgery training: a comparative study.

Reeta M Ramdhian1, Mike Bednar, Gustavo R Mantovani

  • 1Hand Surgery Department, Strasbourg University Hospitals, Strasbourg, France.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
|August 25, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to the article "Cemented K-wire external fixation in juxta-articular enchondroma-related phalangeal pathological fracture".

Hand surgery & rehabilitation·2024
Same author

Is ChatGPT able to pass the first part of the European Board of Hand Surgery diploma examination?

Hand surgery & rehabilitation·2023
Same author

Research and biomechanics: Small steps for scientists but significant progress for clinicians.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2022
Same author

Robotically assisted harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle: A cadaver feasibility study and clinical test case.

Hand surgery & rehabilitation·2016
Same author

Review of Acute Traumatic Closed Mallet Finger Injuries in Adults.

Archives of plastic surgery·2016
Same author

Robotically assisted microsurgery: development of basic skills course.

Archives of plastic surgery·2013

Telemicrosurgery (TMS) and conventional microsurgery (CMS) were compared for learning microsurgical anastomosis. While TMS offers tremor elimination and enhanced vision, CMS demonstrated a faster learning curve due to tactile feedback, crucial for untrained surgeons.

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Techniques
  • Robotic Surgery
  • Microsurgery

Background:

  • Conventional microsurgery (CMS) learning is challenged by physiological tremor.
  • Telemicrosurgery (TMS) theoretically simplifies procedures by eliminating tremor but lacks tactile feedback.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the learning curve of microsurgical anastomosis between TMS and CMS.
  • To evaluate the feasibility of TMS for surgeons without prior experience.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty earthworm anastomoses were performed using 10/0 nylon sutures.
  • Fifteen anastomoses utilized CMS under an operating microscope, and 15 used TMS via a Da Vinci S® robot.
  • Performance was evaluated by suture and anastomosis completion times, and anastomosis integrity (permeability/watertightness).

More Related Videos

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
07:35

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited

Published on: February 16, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 30, 2026

Step By Step: Microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models
05:25

Step By Step: Microsurgical training method combining two nonliving animal models

Published on: May 9, 2015

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited
07:35

The Microscopic Transcanal Approach in Stapes Surgery Revisited

Published on: February 16, 2022

Main Results:

  • The average time per suture was 296 seconds for CMS and 529 seconds for TMS.
  • Anastomosis integrity was 86.66% in both groups.
  • Learning was faster with CMS than TMS, with tactile feedback identified as a limiting factor in TMS for novice surgeons.

Conclusions:

  • CMS presents a faster learning curve than TMS for microsurgical anastomosis in untrained surgeons.
  • Despite the learning curve, TMS offers significant advantages including 3D vision, tremor elimination, and motion scaling.