Related Experiment Videos
Safety of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in medically complicated infants
Philip Minar1, Jeffery Garland, Alfonso Martinez
1Divisions of Gastroenterology and Perinatology, Department of Pediatrics, Wheaton Franciscan Health Care-St Joseph's Regional Hospital, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, and the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Insights
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is safe and feasible for small, medically complicated infants. This study found a low complication rate in infants under 6 kg, supporting its use for nutritional support.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Neonatal Intensive Care
- Minimally Invasive Procedures
Background:
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are vital for nutritional support in children unable to feed orally.
- Limited data exists on PEG safety in small infants, particularly those with complex medical conditions.
- Previous studies report major complication rates for PEG placement ranging from 0.5% to 17% in general pediatric populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the incidence of acute complications associated with PEG placement in medically complicated infants weighing less than 6 kg.
- To evaluate the feasibility and safety of PEG procedures in this specific high-risk infant population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of infants (<6 kg) who underwent PEG placement between January 2001 and June 2008.
- Inclusion criteria focused on infants within the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) setting.
- Data collection included gestational age, weight, indication for PEG, procedural success, and complications.
Main Results:
- Forty infants (mean gestational age 29 weeks, mean weight 3250 g) were included.
- Successful PEG placement was achieved in 95% (38/40) of infants.
- One major complication (pneumomediastinum) and one instance of inability to pass the PEG bumper were recorded. Sixteen infants had concurrent surgical procedures.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is a feasible and safe intervention for small, medically complex infants requiring nutritional support.
- The study demonstrates a low rate of major complications in this vulnerable population.
- PEG insertion can be safely performed in the NICU setting for infants unable to feed orally.
Background And Objective:
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes have been placed in children for more than 2 decades to provide nutrition to those unable to adequately and safely feed orally. Despite the well-documented success of PEG placement in older children, there is only 1 published article documenting the safety of PEG placement in small infants. In all children, PEG studies demonstrate the major complication rate to vary from 0.5% to 17%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of acute complications of PEG placement in medically complicated infants with a weight of less than 6 kg.
Patients And Methods:
: We reviewed the charts of all infants cared for in the neonatal intensive care unit of Wheaton Franciscan Health Care-St Joseph's Regional Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, who received a PEG tube between January 2001 and June 30, 2008.
Results:
Forty infants with a mean gestational age of 29 weeks (range 23-41 weeks) with a mean weight of 3250 g (range 2100-5600 g) at time of PEG placement were included. The primary indication for most infants was dysphagia or inability to orally feed safely. A PEG was successfully placed in 38 of 40 (95%) infants. There was 1 major complication: a 38-week infant with Prader-Willi syndrome developed a pneumomediastinum caused by a tear at the upper esophageal sphincter. In a second infant the PEG bumper could not be passed beyond the upper esophageal sphincter. Sixteen infants had other surgical procedures performed at the time of PEG placement. For those infants only having a PEG placed, the mean procedure time was 10 minutes.
Conclusions:
PEG placement is both feasible and safe in small, medically complicated infants.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...