The Consistent Labeling Problem: Part II
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
Published on: February 8, 2019
1SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE, Departments of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045; Department of Electrical Engineering, Virginia Polytechni.
Abstract:
In this second part of a two-part paper, we explore the power and complexity of the g=fKP and g=vKP class of look-ahead operators which can be used to speed up the tree search in the consistent labeling problem. For a specified K and P we show that the fixedpoint power of g=fKP and g=vKP is the same, that g=fKP+1 is at least as powerful as g=fKP, and that g=vK+1p is at least as powerful at g=fKP. Finally, we define a minimal compatibility relation and show how the standard tree search procedure for finding all the consistent labelings is quicker for a minimal relation. This leads to the concept of grading the complexity of compatibility relations according to how much look-ahead work it requires to reduce them to minimal relations and suggests that the reason look-ahead operators, such as Waltz filtering, work so well is that the compatibility relations used in practice are not very complex and are reducible to minimal or near minimal relations by a g=fKP or g=vKP look-ahead operator with small value for parameter P.
Related Concept Videos
Labeling Emotion
Labeling DNA Probes
Radioisotopes, fluorophores, or small molecule binding partners like biotin or digoxigenin, are the most widely used reporter tags for labeling DNA probes. These labels can be attached to the probe DNA molecule via...
Law of Independent Assortment
Law of Independent Assortment
Cognitive Dissonance
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
