Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods

Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a result, EDTA...

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte properties and...

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II

In gas chromatography, different detectors are employed to meet specific analytical needs. These detectors are often categorized based on their detection mechanisms and the types of compounds they are best suited to analyze. Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCD), Flame Ionization Detectors (FID), and Electron Capture Detectors (ECD) represent common categories, each with unique operating principles and applications. However, beyond these, several other detectors are designed for more specialized...

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I

There are different types of detectors used in gas chromatography, each with its own specific properties that make it suitable for detecting certain types of analytes. The most commonly used detectors in GC are thermal conductivity detector (TCD), flame ionization detector (FID), and electron capture detector (ECD).
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...

Detection of Black Holes

Detection of Black Holes

Although black holes were theoretically postulated in the 1920s, they remained outside the domain of observational astronomy until the 1970s.
Their closest cousins are neutron stars, which are composed almost entirely of neutrons packed against each other, making them extremely dense. A neutron star has the same mass as the Sun but its diameter is only a few kilometers. Therefore, the escape velocity from their surface is close to the speed of light.
Not until the 1960s, when the first neutron...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Planning collision-free paths for robotic arm among obstacles.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2011

Same author

Influence of frame rate and image delay on virtual driving performance.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·1997

Same author

Ovarian epithelial tumors of low malignant potential.

Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics·1989

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

End-To-End Deep Neural Network for Salient Object Detection in Complex Environments

End-To-End Deep Neural Network for Salient Object Detection in Complex Environments

Published on: December 15, 2023

Two new edge detectors.

C J Jacobus¹, R T Chien

¹Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801; Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, TX 75265.

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

|August 27, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This paper presents two novel edge detection algorithms for image processing. One method uses multiple difference detectors, while the other employs three-state images and masks for improved contour extraction.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

End-To-End Deep Neural Network for Salient Object Detection in Complex Environments

End-To-End Deep Neural Network for Salient Object Detection in Complex Environments

Published on: December 15, 2023

Area of Science:

Computer Vision
Image Processing
Algorithm Development

Background:

Edge detection is crucial for image analysis and computer vision.
Existing difference-based edge detectors can be confused by second-order enhancements.
Human contour extraction benefits from second-order enhancement.

Purpose of the Study:

Introduce two novel edge detection algorithms.
Address limitations of current difference-based edge detectors.
Explore hardware implementation and biological analogs for edge detection.

Main Methods:

Algorithm 1: Utilizes multiple difference-based edge detectors with peak center selection (absolute maximum or center of mass).
Algorithm 2: Translates intensity images into three-state images (plus one, zero, minus one) and applies multiple three-state edge masks.
Comparison of the two novel algorithms against popular existing edge detection techniques.

Main Results:

The first algorithm effectively identifies edge centers using established techniques.
The second algorithm demonstrates a novel approach to edge detection using three-state representations.
Performance comparison indicates the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed methods relative to literature techniques.

Conclusions:

The developed algorithms offer new approaches to edge detection in image processing.
The second algorithm shows potential for hardware implementation and has biological relevance.
Further research can explore optimizations and applications of these novel edge detection methods.