Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Deciding when to "cash in" when outcomes are continuously improving: an escalating interest task
Michael E Young1, Tara L Webb, Eric A Jacobs
1Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, IL 62901, USA. meyoung@siu.edu
This study used a video game to explore decision-making between immediate and delayed rewards. Participants adjusted their waiting time based on how outcomes improved over time, showing sensitivity to delay to reinforcement.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Psychology
- Video Game Research
Background:
- Decision-making involves choosing between smaller sooner and larger later outcomes.
- Understanding sensitivity to delay to reinforcement is crucial in behavioral studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate choice between smaller sooner and larger later outcomes using a novel video game paradigm.
- To assess participant sensitivity to the rate of outcome improvement over time.
Main Methods:
- A first-person shooter video game was adapted to simulate escalating reward potential.
- Participants made choices involving waiting for increased weapon damage (outcome).
- Two experiments manipulated the mathematical function relating waiting time to outcome improvement.
Main Results:
- Participants demonstrated sensitivity to the mathematical function defining waiting and outcome potential.
- Waiting time increased when it led to faster target elimination.
- Participants waited longer to increase outcome probability versus outcome magnitude for equivalent expected values.
Conclusions:
- The video game task effectively models sensitivity to delay to reinforcement.
- Participants adapt their choices based on how outcomes improve continuously.
- This paradigm is suitable for studying delay discounting across species.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Persuasion Strategies
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

