Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography.

A Sherwood1, M T Allen, J Fahrenberg

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7175.

Psychophysiology
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical Performance of Enamel Microabrasion for Esthetic Management of Stained Dental Fluorosis Teeth.

Operative dentistry·2020
Same author

A computer-based avatar task can differentiate avoidant and non-avoidant coping styles<sup>.</sup>

Anxiety, stress, and coping·2019
Same author

Avoidance learning and classical eyeblink conditioning as model systems to explore a learning diathesis model of PTSD.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2019
Same author

The distressed (Type D) personality factor of social inhibition, but not negative affectivity, enhances eyeblink conditioning.

Behavioural brain research·2018
Same author

The effect of Medicaid payer status on patient outcomes following repair of massive rotator cuff tears.

Musculoskeletal surgery·2017
Same author

US alone trials presented during acquisition do not disrupt classical eyeblink conditioning: Empirical and computational findings.

Behavioural brain research·2017
Same journal

Neural Sensitivity to Conversational Inter-Speaker Gaps in the Broad Autism Phenotype.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Open Communication Can Lead to Equivalent EEG Data Quality for Black Women: Multilevel Modeling Interindividual Differences on Emotional Scene and Face Perception.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

What's in a Mean? Comparing Interbeat Interval Averaging Methods Across Variability Levels and Window Lengths.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Model-Free and Model-Based Learning in Human Fear Conditioning.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Examining the Impact of Acute Exercise and Arousal Reappraisal on Stressor-Evoked Psychological and Cardiovascular Responses.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same journal

Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Hierarchical Dimensions of Psychopathology.

Psychophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Impedance cardiography (ICG) is a noninvasive method for measuring cardiac output. This review discusses ICG methods, highlighting the need for standardized reporting to improve research consistency and validity.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Instrumentation

Background:

  • Impedance cardiography (ICG) offers a noninvasive approach to assess hemodynamic parameters like cardiac output.
  • Despite decades of use, the theoretical underpinnings of ICG remain debated, with validation relying on empirical evidence.
  • Lack of methodological standardization has hindered widespread acceptance and consistent application of ICG.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current impedance cardiography methodologies.
  • To provide an informed basis for selecting among different methodological approaches.
  • To advocate for clear and detailed reporting of ICG methods in research.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of established and alternative impedance cardiography techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of physiological interpretations of the impedance cardiogram.
  • Review of empirical validation studies supporting ICG's efficacy.

    • Main Results:

    • Current common ICG methodologies are presented as de facto standards.
    • Discrepancies in research findings may stem from variations in ICG methodology.
    • A need for improved methodological rigor and transparency in ICG studies is identified.

    Conclusions:

    • Enhanced understanding of ICG's physiological basis exists.
    • Standardization of ICG methodology is crucial for reliable results.
    • Detailed reporting of ICG methods will facilitate research comparison and advancement.