Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Focusing of Light in the Eye

Focusing of Light in the Eye

Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mesopic Illumination in Natural Environments: Implications for Myopia Research.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026

Same author

Combination of tissue-derived and shape-based parameters for subclinical keratoconus detection.

Biomedical optics express·2026

Same author

Corrected Percentile Curves to Track Myopisation-The Anyang Childhood Eye Study.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026

Same author

Peripheral refractive errors in pseudophakic eyes: <i>in vitro</i> evaluation and optical simulation.

Biomedical optics express·2026

Same author

Crystalline Lens Shape During Accommodation in Children.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026

Same author

Principles of a Non-orthogonal Optical Surface with Potential for Correction of Irregular Astigmatism.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Comparing methods to estimate the human lens power.

Jos J Rozema¹, David A Atchison, Marie-José Tassignon

¹Department of Ophthalmology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science

|August 30, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Calculating human lens power without lens thickness can be approximated using modified methods. The modified Stenström and Bennett-Rabbetts methods, with optimized constants, offer good accuracy for emmetropic and myopic eyes.

More Related Videos

Automated Compression Testing of the Ocular Lens

Automated Compression Testing of the Ocular Lens

Published on: April 5, 2024

Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher

Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher

Published on: February 23, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

$Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter$

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter

Published on: September 16, 2025

Automated Compression Testing of the Ocular Lens

Automated Compression Testing of the Ocular Lens

Published on: April 5, 2024

Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher

Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher

Published on: February 23, 2018

Area of Science:

Ophthalmology
Biomedical Optics
Optometry

Background:

Accurate human lens power calculation is crucial for refractive error correction.
Lens thickness is a key parameter in many lens power calculation formulas.
Alternative methods are needed when lens thickness is unavailable.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the accuracy of different human lens power calculation methods when lens thickness is not available.
To evaluate the performance of the modified Stenström and Bennett-Rabbetts methods.
To determine if customizing constants improves accuracy.

Main Methods:

Utilized biometry and refraction data from 184 emmetropic and myopic eyes.
Compared the Bennett method (requires thickness) with modified Stenström and Bennett-Rabbetts methods (do not require thickness).
Validated results against phakometry data for a subgroup of 66 emmetropic eyes.

Main Results:

The Bennett method showed good agreement with phakometry in emmetropic eyes.
Modified Stenström and Bennett-Rabbetts methods initially deviated significantly from the Bennett method and phakometry.
Optimizing 'c' constants improved agreement, achieving within ±1 D for 95% of eyes compared to the Bennett method.

Conclusions:

The modified Stenström and Bennett-Rabbetts methods, with appropriate constants, provide a good approximation of human lens power.
These methods are suitable for emmetropic and myopic eyes when lens thickness data is absent.
Customization of constants is key to achieving high accuracy in lens power calculations.