Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System01:29

Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System

The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ex ante evaluation of risk adjustment models for prospective provider payment: a conceptual framework and empirical application.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

Reliability of data-driven versus expert-driven composite indicators in between-hospital comparisons on quality of oesophagogastric cancer surgery: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Changes in spending, quality indicators, and provider experiences following the introduction of a population-based payment model in dutch primary care: a mixed methods evaluation.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

Case-mix adjustment for between-hospital comparisons in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2025
Same author

How Do Bundled Payment Initiatives Account for Differences in Patient Risk Profiles? A Systematic Review.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2024
Same author

Quality Improvement Intervention for Reducing Acute Treatment Times in Ischemic Stroke: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA neurology·2024
Same journal

Cost-effectiveness of community versus hospital-based mental healthcare for severe mental illness in South-East Europe: economic evaluation of five randomised trials.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026
Same journal

Coordinating care across hospitals: how integration shapes patient mobility.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026
Same journal

A comparative analysis of managed entry agreements in Europe: trends, reporting practices, and financial outcomes.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026
Same journal

Comparing universal health coverage models: an analysis of policy transmission efficiency in SAARC and ASEAN countries.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of solomon's socioeconomic status index (SESI): a multidimensional household classification tool for South Asia.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026
Same journal

Who pays and Who benefits? A distributional health-economic evaluation of strengthening the UK soft drinks industry levy.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs.

Frank Eijkenaar1

  • 1Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. eijkenaar@bmg.eur.nl

The European Journal of Health Economics : HEPAC : Health Economics in Prevention and Care
|September 2, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pay for performance (P4P) programs can improve healthcare quality, but effective design is crucial. This study synthesizes literature to offer evidence-based recommendations for optimizing P4P initiatives.

More Related Videos

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Healthcare Management
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Pay for performance (P4P) is a widely adopted strategy to incentivize healthcare providers for improved quality and efficiency.
  • Despite its prevalence, the effectiveness of P4P programs is debated, with mixed evidence suggesting potential design flaws limit success.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize theoretical and empirical literature on Pay for Performance (P4P) program design.
  • To identify key considerations for creating fair and effective P4P initiatives in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Literature synthesis of theoretical and empirical studies on P4P program design.
  • Analysis of critical issues impacting the success of P4P initiatives.

Main Results:

  • Broad performance measures are recommended if comprehensible; "selection" and "teaching to the test" are valid concerns.
  • Sophisticated risk adjustment is vital, group incentives are preferred, and frequent, low-powered payouts are suggested.
  • Absolute targets, multiple measures, and decoupling P4P from base payments are favored, but context-specific tailoring and further research are essential.

Conclusions:

  • Designing effective Pay for Performance (P4P) programs requires careful consideration of multiple factors, including performance measurement, incentive structures, and provider involvement.
  • While general principles can be derived, P4P program design must be adapted to the specific healthcare context.
  • Further empirical research is needed to validate proposed design elements and confirm the overall effectiveness of P4P.