Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Sampling for Estimating Frankliniella Species Flower Thrips and Orius Species Predators in Field Experiments
Published on: July 17, 2019
Accuracy, precision, and economic efficiency for three methods of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) population density
Andrew M Sutherland1, Michael P Parrella
1Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. asutherl@ucdavis.edu
Abstract:
Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a major horticultural pest and an important vector of plant viruses in many parts of the world. Methods for assessing thrips population density for pest management decision support are often inaccurate or imprecise due to thrips' positive thigmotaxis, small size, and naturally aggregated populations. Two established methods, flower tapping and an alcohol wash, were compared with a novel method, plant desiccation coupled with passive trapping, using accuracy, precision and economic efficiency as comparative variables. Observed accuracy was statistically similar and low (37.8-53.6%) for all three methods. Flower tapping was the least expensive method, in terms of person-hours, whereas the alcohol wash method was the most expensive. Precision, expressed by relative variation, depended on location within the greenhouse, location on greenhouse benches, and the sampling week, but it was generally highest for the flower tapping and desiccation methods. Economic efficiency, expressed by relative net precision, was highest for the flower tapping method and lowest for the alcohol wash method. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed for all three methods used. If relative density assessment methods such as these can all be assumed to accurately estimate a constant proportion of absolute density, then high precision becomes the methodological goal in terms of measuring insect population density, decision making for pest management, and pesticide efficacy assessments.
Related Concept Videos
Methods to Assess Microbial Populations
Microbial Growth Measurement: Direct Methods
What are Populations and Communities?
Microbial Growth Measurement: Indirect Methods
Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

