Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Differentiating behavioral trust and trustworthiness beliefs to improve science communication practice and research.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Scientists' public engagement goals: Perceived importance and personal prioritization.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2025
Same author

Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists' biographies: Benevolence beliefs.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2024
Same author

What are you assessing when you measure "trust" in scientists with a direct measure?

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2023
Same author

Strategic communication as planned behavior for science and risk communication: A theory-based approach to studying communicator choice.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2022
Same author

Science communication fellowship programs as gatekeepers.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2022
Same journal

Competition and Collaboration in the AI Race: Country-LevelDirectional Evidence for Risk Monitoring and Policy.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Cyber Resilience: Management With Cybersecurity Controls.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Jack Fowle: Combining Values, Experience, and Teamwork to Improve Risk Analysis.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

A Hybrid FMEA-AHP Framework for Risk Prioritization in Nontransparent Artificial Intelligence Systems.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Trust-Building Communication for Extreme Heat Preparedness.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same journal

Spring Broken: A Risk Analysis of Fatal and Nonfatal Traffic Injuries in Florida.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System
04:55

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System

Published on: November 22, 2016

Fairness and nanotechnology concern.

Katherine A McComas1, John C Besley

  • 1School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of South Carolina, SC, USA. kam19@cornell.edu

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|September 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Public perception of nanotechnology risk is linked to fairness. Concerns about unequal benefits and biased procedures increase worry, while informational fairness influences acceptance of risk management strategies.

More Related Videos

Protocols for Assessing Radiofrequency Interactions with Gold Nanoparticles and Biological Systems for Non-invasive Hyperthermia Cancer Therapy
10:51

Protocols for Assessing Radiofrequency Interactions with Gold Nanoparticles and Biological Systems for Non-invasive Hyperthermia Cancer Therapy

Published on: August 28, 2013

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering
07:47

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System
04:55

Testing of Nanoparticle Release from a Composite Containing Nanomaterial Using a Chamber System

Published on: November 22, 2016

Protocols for Assessing Radiofrequency Interactions with Gold Nanoparticles and Biological Systems for Non-invasive Hyperthermia Cancer Therapy
10:51

Protocols for Assessing Radiofrequency Interactions with Gold Nanoparticles and Biological Systems for Non-invasive Hyperthermia Cancer Therapy

Published on: August 28, 2013

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering
07:47

Experimental Protocol to Investigate Particle Aerosolization of a Product Under Abrasion and Under Environmental Weathering

Published on: September 16, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Risk Analysis
  • Public Perception

Background:

  • Public acceptance of new technologies like nanotechnology is crucial for their development and implementation.
  • Perceptions of fairness in risk assessment and management processes significantly influence public trust and acceptance.
  • Understanding the dimensions of fairness that impact public views on nanotechnology is essential for effective risk communication.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between fairness perceptions of scientists and risk managers and public concerns and acceptance regarding nanotechnology.
  • To determine which dimensions of fairness (distributional, procedural, interpersonal, informational) are most influential in shaping public attitudes towards nanotechnology risk management.

Main Methods:

  • Two national random surveys were conducted with American adults (n=305 and n=529).
  • Survey participants evaluated nanotechnology risk management based on perceptions of fairness towards scientists and risk managers.
  • Statistical analyses examined the correlation between four dimensions of fairness and public concern and acceptance.

Main Results:

  • Beliefs that scientific research outcomes create unequal benefits (distributional fairness) and that protective procedures are biased (procedural fairness) were associated with higher nanotechnology concerns.
  • Perceptions of scientists treating individuals with respect (interpersonal fairness) and providing information (informational fairness) did not significantly predict concern.
  • For risk managers, only perceived informational fairness consistently predicted acceptance of nanotechnology risk management.

Conclusions:

  • Fairness perceptions, particularly regarding distributional and procedural aspects, play a significant role in public concern about nanotechnology.
  • Informational fairness is a key factor influencing the public's acceptance of nanotechnology risk management strategies.
  • Incorporating fairness considerations into the study of public perceptions is vital for understanding and managing nanotechnology risks effectively.