Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

07:56
Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Feasibility of bone density evaluation using plain digital radiography
M B Kinds1, L W Bartels, A C A Marijnissen
1Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
|September 3, 2011
Summary
Accurate bone density (BD) measurement in osteoarthritis (OA) is feasible with digital radiography. Optimizing post-processing and acquisition settings significantly improves BD measurement accuracy, enabling reliable radiographic evaluation of subchondral bone changes.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Osteoarthritis Research
- Biomedical Imaging
Background:
- Subchondral bone changes, specifically sclerosis, are key indicators in osteoarthritis (OA) radiographic evaluation.
- Current bone density (BD) assessment in OA often relies on subjective interpretation of plain digital radiographs.
- Acquisition and post-processing (PP) settings can influence the accuracy of BD measurements from digital radiographs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of digital radiography acquisition and post-processing settings on bone density (BD) measurement.
- To determine if accurate BD measurements are achievable for evaluating subchondral bone changes in osteoarthritis (OA).
Main Methods:
- A hydroxyapatite bone density standard (BDS) simulating BD range of 1.0-5.75 g/cm² was used.
- Digital radiographs were acquired with varied settings and subjected to clinical and minimal post-processing (PP).
- An aluminum step wedge normalized gray values to mm aluminum equivalents (mmAl) for BD assessment.
Main Results:
- Minimal PP improved the correlation between actual BD and normalized BD (R²=0.98) compared to clinical PP (R²=0.96).
- Increased kilovoltage (kV) further enhanced the correlation.
- Despite clinical PP, the average standard deviation (SD) was 0.97 mmAl, smaller than the clinically observed change in early OA (2.51 mmAl), indicating feasibility.
Conclusions:
- Post-processing and acquisition settings critically affect radiographic bone density measurement outcomes.
- Accurate bone density measurement using plain digital radiography is feasible when settings are carefully controlled.

