Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

Legal Guidelines for Documentation

The legal guidelines for nursing documentation are essential for ensuring accurate, professional, and ethical recording of patient care. The guidelines are discussed here:

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II

Effective documentation is an integral part of nursing practice. Here are some essential guidelines to follow when documenting patient care:
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.

Ethical Standards II

Ethical Standards II

Ethical standards are the backbone of nursing practice, guiding nurses as they interact with patients, families, and colleagues. These standards are crucial for providing safe, empathetic care centered on the patient's needs.
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Differences in Pelvic Floor Morphometry for Women with Persistent Pelvic Pain and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis-A Cross-Sectional Study.

International urogynecology journal·2026

Same author

Response to the article 'Role of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Women with Obstetric Sphincter Injuries: Narrative Review'.

International urogynecology journal·2026

Same author

Is There a Difference in Hiatal Area on Straining Between Type I and II Levator Avulsions?

International urogynecology journal·2026

Same author

AI driven interactive extraction of tomographic ultrasound imaging sequences for anal sphincter defects.

Scientific reports·2026

Same author

Artificial Intelligence for the Automated Measurement of Hiatal Dimensions.

International urogynecology journal·2026

Same author

Is It Useful to Distinguish Type I and Type II Avulsions on Transperineal Ultrasound?

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Guidelines and standardisation documents should be published anonymously.

Hans Peter Dietz¹

¹Sydney Medical School Nepean, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia. hpdietz@bigpond.com

International Urogynecology Journal

|September 3, 2011

Summary

Guidelines and standardization documents require anonymous publication and mandatory peer review every few years to ensure scientific progress and prevent conflicts of interest.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Area of Science:

Scientific publishing
Standardization
Peer review

Background:

Guidelines and standardization documents are crucial for scientific progress.
Potential conflicts of interest can arise in document creation and review.
Current publication practices may not adequately address these issues.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a framework for publishing guidelines and standardization documents.
To ensure objectivity and integrity in the development of scientific standards.

Main Methods:

Anonymous publication of all submitted guidelines and standardization documents.
Implementation of a mandatory, recurring peer review process (e.g., every 3-5 years).

Main Results:

Anonymous publication mitigates bias and conflicts of interest.
Regular peer review ensures continued relevance and accuracy of documents.
This process enhances the credibility and trustworthiness of scientific standards.

Conclusions:

Anonymous publication and mandatory periodic peer review are essential for maintaining the integrity of guidelines and standardization documents.
This approach fosters scientific advancement by ensuring unbiased and up-to-date standards.