Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

Visual Agnosia

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Computer-Aided Colonoscopy Alert Fatigue and Its Effect on Adenoma Detection.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026

Same author

Basic Science and Pathogenesis.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025

Same author

Implementing discard strategies for diminutive polyps using autonomous CADx in clinical practice.

Gut·2025

Same author

Prospective Comparison of Pathology and Computer-Aided Optical Diagnosis for Polyp Characterization Using Expert Consensus.

Digestive diseases and sciences·2025

Same author

Personalized Robotic Training on a Planar Reaching Task.

IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]·2025

Same author

Diagnostic performance and agreement of auditors for evaluation of computer-aided optical polyp diagnosis: Prospective study.

Endoscopy international open·2025

Same journal

Peripheral and central vestibular neuromodulation improve postural control in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized, sham-controlled, multi-arm intervention study.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Ankle-foot orthosis mechanical testing: a scoping review.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Neuromechanical synergy patterns explain metabolic efficiency differences during the sit-to-walk transition.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Biohybrid cochlear implants: neural interfaces, regenerative pathways, and translational benchmarks.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Transcutaneous spinal stimulation with upper extremity robotic training in chronic stroke and spinal cord injury: individual neurophysiological and clinical responses.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Visual error augmentation enhances learning in three dimensions.

Ian Sharp¹, Felix Huang, James Patton

¹Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, 218 SEO, MC 063, 851 South Morgan Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607-7052, USA.

Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation

|September 6, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Error augmentation (EA) training improved motor learning in a virtual reality sensorimotor reversal task. Subjects using EA demonstrated faster, more accurate movements and continuous motion, supporting distorted reality for enhanced adaptation.

More Related Videos

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Published on: December 8, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) of the Visual Cortex with Wide-View Retinotopic Stimulation

Published on: December 8, 2023

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Robotics
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Motor learning research explores methods to enhance skill acquisition.
Sensorimotor adaptation is crucial for tasks like robotic surgery.
Preliminary evidence suggests Error Augmentation (EA) may improve motor learning.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the efficacy of visually enhanced Error Augmentation (EA) for motor learning.
To assess EA's impact on adaptation to a sensorimotor reversal task in a virtual reality environment.

Main Methods:

10 healthy subjects performed a virtual reality sensorimotor reversal task with a 180-degree coordinate transformation.
Subjects were divided into two groups: one receiving EA, the other control.
Performance was evaluated based on target acquisition speed and trajectory deviation after 500 trials.

Main Results:

Error Augmentation (EA) trained subjects showed significantly faster target acquisition (0.4s) and reduced trajectory deviation (0.5cm) compared to controls.
EA influenced practice, leading to more continuous movements and fewer errors.
Adaptation occurred even with extreme sensory discordance, suggesting EA promotes robust learning.

Conclusions:

Distorted reality through Error Augmentation (EA) can promote more complete motor learning and adaptation than standard training.
The benefits of EA were evident in a challenging sensorimotor reversal task.
Learned adaptations were rapidly reversible upon removal of the visual distortion.