Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
Published on: December 22, 2015
Gerald Zimmermann1, Arash Moghaddam
1Theresienkrankenhaus Mannheim, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Germany. g.zimmermann@theresienkrankenhaus.de
Abstract:
Autologous bone is used very often in the treatment of fresh fractures, delayed unions and non-unions. Alternatives have included allografts and in recent years also demineralized bone matrix. The growing availability of good synthetic bone grafts and their advantages in safety and avoiding donor-site morbidity are the reasons that these products are being used more and more. There are on the market a wide variety of substitutes with different capabilities. Nevertheless autologous bone graft is still considered as the gold standard and will be discussed here in that context. Osteoconductive, osteogenic and osteoinductive products will also be classified and their advantages and disadvantages described.
Related Concept Videos
The Bone Matrix
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...

