Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is a collection of statistical and mathematical techniques used to develop, improve, and optimize processes. It is particularly valuable when many input variables or factors potentially influence a response variable.
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

Hazard Rate

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...

Relative Risk

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...

Survival Curves

Survival Curves

Survival curves are graphical representations that depict the survival experience of a population over time, offering an intuitive way to track the proportion of individuals who remain event-free at each time point. These curves are widely used in fields such as medicine, public health, and reliability engineering to visualize and compare survival probabilities across different groups or conditions.
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Getting It Done and Done Well: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Pitfalls and Success Factors for Professional Development Experiences During Surgical Residency.

Journal of surgical education·2026

Same author

Pulmonary Function and Survival 1 Year After Dupilumab Treatment of Acute Moderate to Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Follow-up Study From a Phase 2a Trial.

Open forum infectious diseases·2024

Same author

Ongoing Analytical Procedure Performance Verification Using a Risk-Based Approach to Determine Performance Monitoring Requirements.

Analytical chemistry·2024

Same author

Pulmonary function and survival one year after dupilumab treatment of acute moderate to severe COVID-19: A follow up study from a Phase IIa trial.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2023

Same author

Frequency and Characteristics of Social Media Use among General Surgery Trainees.

The Journal of surgical research·2022

Same author

Selection of Analytical Technology and Development of Analytical Procedures Using the Analytical Target Profile.

Analytical chemistry·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Method ruggedness studies incorporating a risk based approach: a tutorial.

Phil J Borman¹, Marion J Chatfield, Ivana Damjanov

¹Product Development and Statistical Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline Medicines Research Centre, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2NY, UK. phil.j.borman@gsk.com

Analytica Chimica Acta

|September 6, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This tutorial details how to assess analytical method ruggedness using risk assessment and experimental design. This approach improves precision evaluation beyond standard validation, ensuring method reliability across different conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

Analytical Chemistry
Method Development
Quality Control

Background:

Analytical method ruggedness is crucial for assessing variability due to noise factors.
Traditional intermediate precision studies may not fully capture method robustness.
Ruggedness testing can be applied during method development or laboratory transfer.

Purpose of the Study:

To explain the application of design and analysis methodology for improved method ruggedness assessment.
To define analytical method ruggedness as an experimental evaluation of noise factors.
To demonstrate how risk assessment aids in identifying and controlling factors affecting method performance.

Main Methods:

Utilizing risk assessment to identify potential noise factors (e.g., analyst, instrument, batch).
Designing ruggedness studies to challenge the method and evaluate the impact of uncontrolled noise factors.
Analyzing results to distinguish special cause and common cause variability.

Main Results:

Identification of specific circumstances causing special cause variability.
Apportionment of common cause variability to pinpoint influential factors.
Assessment of method precision requirements based on total common cause variability.

Conclusions:

A well-designed ruggedness study provides a more rigorous assessment of method precision.
Risk assessment is essential for effective ruggedness study design.
Understanding variability sources ensures achievable method precision requirements.