Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Microcirculatory considerations in NMR flow imaging.

J B Bassingthwaighte1

  • 1Center for Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|May 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diverse Data Sets Can Yield Reliable Information through Mechanistic Modeling: Salicylic Acid Clearance.

British journal of pharmaceutical research·2016
Same author

Left ventricular finite element model bounded by a systemic circulation model.

Journal of biomechanical engineering·2013
Same author

BIFURCATING DISTRIBUTIVE SYSTEM USING MONTE CARLO METHOD.

Mathematical and computer modelling·2012
Same author

Evaluating maximum likelihood estimation methods to determine the Hurst coeficient.

Physica A·2012
Same author

The spectra and periodograms of anti-correlated discrete fractional Gaussian noise.

Physica A·2012
Same author

The kinetics of Ca-Na exchange in excitable tissue.

Mathematical biosciences·2011
Same journal

A Comparison of Tissue Property Values Estimated Using Conventional Cardiac MRF and MT-Cardiac MRF.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Dependence of the Extra-Cellular Diffusion Coefficient on the Fractions of Neurites and Cell Bodies in Gray Matter.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Triple-Pulse <sup>23</sup>Na MRI Sequence (TriNa) for Simultaneous Acquisition of Spin-Density-Weighted and Fluid-Attenuated Images.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of Phantom Doping Materials in Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

Design of an 8-Channel Transmit 32-Channel Receive 11.7T Head Coil and Evaluation of SNR Gains.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
Same journal

The Potential for Absolute Temperature Imaging Based on Brain Metabolites Using an FID-Shifting Approach in Gradient Echo Planar Spectroscopic Imaging (GREPSI).

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Regional blood flow can be estimated using tracer deposition or flow-limited methods. Tracer deposition is simpler and allows more observation time for accurate flow measurement.

Area of Science:

  • Physiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Accurate regional flow estimation is crucial for understanding organ function.
  • Current methods involve tracer concentration measurements, with two primary approaches: deposition and flow-limited.
  • Each method presents distinct advantages and challenges regarding tracer properties and observation techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and contrast two main methods for regional flow estimation: tracer deposition and flow-limited transport.
  • To discuss the requirements for suitable tracers in each method, particularly for applications like Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR).
  • To highlight the practical considerations for implementing these techniques in physiological research.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses the tracer deposition method, emphasizing 100% extraction and external detection capabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explains the flow-limited method, requiring tracers with transport passage through the organ.
  • Considers tracers limited to intravascular space versus those distributing within tissue, influencing observation time and resolution.

    • Main Results:

    • Tracer deposition is simpler and allows extended observation periods for local concentration detection.
    • Flow-limited markers require rapid, high-resolution techniques due to short transit times and strict intravascular limitations.
    • Tracers with larger distribution volumes, like tracer water, offer slower washout and more observation time, though exceptions exist (e.g., brain).

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of method depends on tracer properties and desired observation parameters.
    • Tracer deposition offers a simpler approach with more flexibility in observation timing.
    • Further research is needed for suitable, safe tracers for advanced techniques like NMR flow measurement.