Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026
04:24
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
Published on: April 19, 2019
Modified Rand method to derive quality indicators: a case study in cardiac rehabilitation
Mariëtte Van Engen-Verheul1, Hareld Kemps, Roderik Kraaijenhagen
1Dept. of Medical Informatics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.m.vanengen-verheul@amc.uva.nl
Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|September 7, 2011
Summary
This study developed 18 quality indicators (QIs) for cardiac rehabilitation using a modified Rand method. These QIs integrate expert and patient input for improved healthcare quality feedback.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Clinical Performance Measurement
Background:
- Quality indicators (QIs) are crucial for assessing healthcare quality and providing performance feedback to professionals.
- A continuous, multifaceted guideline implementation strategy incorporating decision support, QI feedback, and benchmarking was previously developed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To focus on the development of quality indicators (QIs) for cardiac rehabilitation.
- To present the results of a case study focused on QI development in this specific field.
Main Methods:
- A modified Rand method was employed for QI development.
- This method integrated findings from a comprehensive literature search and guideline review.
- Expert and patient panels participated in an extensive rating and consensus procedure.
Main Results:
- The study successfully developed a final set of 18 quality indicators for cardiac rehabilitation.
- The modified Rand method effectively combined diverse data sources for QI consensus.
Conclusions:
- The developed QIs provide a robust framework for assessing and improving cardiac rehabilitation quality.
- The methodology used can be applied to develop QIs in other clinical areas.
Related Concept Videos
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...