Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Signal and System01:26

Signal and System

A signal x(t) is a set of data or a time function representing a variable of interest. Signals typically convey information about a phenomenon, such as atmospheric temperature, humidity, human voice, television images, a dog's bark, or birdsongs. More generally, a signal can be a function of more than one independent variable. For instance, images depend on horizontal and vertical positions and can be regarded as two-dimensional signals. However, this text will focus on one-dimensional signals...
What is a Sensory System?01:31

What is a Sensory System?

Sensory systems detect stimuli—such as light and sound waves—and transduce them into neural signals that can be interpreted by the nervous system. In addition to external stimuli detected by the senses, some sensory systems detect internal stimuli—such as the proprioceptors in muscles and tendons that send feedback about limb position.
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model01:29

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The Two-State Receptor Model01:29

The Two-State Receptor Model

The two-state receptor model explains a drug's interaction with receptors, such as G protein-coupled receptors and ligand-gated ion channels, to induce or inhibit a biological response. When no natural ligands are present, a receptor exists in an equilibrium of inactive (Ri) and active (Ra) conformations. The inactive form does not produce a response, while the active form generates a basal effect known as constitutive activity.
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational modeling in developmental science.

Advances in child development and behavior·2026
Same author

Baroreflex Activation Therapy In Heart Failure-the Barostim-Enabled Neurohormonal Intervention for Improving Treatment of Heart Failure (BENEFIT-HF) Trial Rationale and Design.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026
Same author

Assessment of student confidence, knowledge, and attitudes after use of interactive computer modules in a university-level cardiovascular physiology course.

Advances in physiology education·2026
Same author

Visual Tools for Informed Decision-Making in Large-Core Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

TESLA Trial: Rationale, Protocol, and Design.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026
Same author

PICASSO (Proximal Internal Carotid Artery Acute Stroke Secondary to Tandem Lesion or Local Occlusion)  Thrombectomy Randomized Trial: Study Protocol and Rationale.

Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

A dynamic stimulus-driven model of signal detection.

Brandon M Turner1, Trisha Van Zandt, Scott Brown

  • 1Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43202, USA.

Psychological Review
|September 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a dynamic, adaptive model for signal detection theory, enhancing cognitive models of memory and choice. The new approach explains how stimulus representations develop with experience, improving predictions of cognitive performance over time.

More Related Videos

Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches
07:23

Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches

Published on: August 4, 2014

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0
07:41

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches
07:23

Using Insect Electroantennogram Sensors on Autonomous Robots for Olfactory Searches

Published on: August 4, 2014

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0
07:41

Modeling Fast-scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data from Electrically Stimulated Dopamine Neurotransmission Data Using QNsim1.0

Published on: June 5, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Classic signal detection models assume fixed stimulus representations and response criteria, regardless of observer experience.
  • These assumptions limit the models' ability to explain dynamic changes in cognitive performance over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel dynamic, adaptive model of signal detection theory.
  • To address limitations in classic models regarding fixed stimulus representations and response criteria.
  • To explain the development of stimulus representations and their impact on cognitive performance.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a dynamic, adaptive model of signal detection.
  • Simulated model behavior to examine its properties.
  • Conducted experiments to gather data for model testing.
  • Fit the model to recognition memory data.

Main Results:

  • The model demonstrates how stimulus representations can develop from subjective priors, explaining performance changes over time.
  • The model's structure supports a decision-making process independent of a fixed response criterion.
  • Simulations and experimental data support the model's validity.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed dynamic, adaptive model offers a more flexible and realistic account of signal detection in cognitive tasks.
  • This framework advances our understanding of how experience shapes stimulus representations and influences memory, choice, and categorization.
  • Feedback plays a crucial role in the development of stimulus representations within this adaptive model.