Myocardial iron homeostasis in advanced chronic heart failure patients
Przemysław Leszek1, Barbara Sochanowicz, Małgorzata Szperl
1Institute of Cardiology, ul. Alpejska 42, 04-628 Warszawa, Poland. przemyslaw.leszek@ikard.pl
Insights
Heart failure patients show reduced myocardial iron levels, which are not accurately reflected by standard serum iron markers, except for soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR). Myocardial ferritin decreased in patients with low serum iron.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biochemistry
- Iron Metabolism
Background:
- Iron deficiency and anemia are common in heart failure (HF).
- Current iron supplementation guidelines rely on serum iron markers.
- Myocardial iron load and homeostasis in HF remain poorly understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess myocardial iron (M-Iron), ferritin (M-FR), and transferrin receptor (M-sTfR) in HF patients.
- To compare myocardial iron markers with serum iron markers.
- To investigate the relationship between myocardial iron status and serum iron levels.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of explanted failing hearts (FH) from 33 HF patients and 11 non-failing hearts (NFH).
- Measurement of myocardial iron using Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis (INAA).
- Quantification of myocardial ferritin and transferrin receptor using ELISA.
- Assessment of serum iron, ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR).
Main Results:
- Myocardial iron (M-Iron) was significantly reduced in both left (LV) and right ventricles (RV) of FH compared to NFH.
- Serum soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) was the only serum marker negatively correlated with M-Iron.
- In patients with reduced serum iron (TSAT < 15%), myocardial ferritin (M-FR) was significantly lower in the RV compared to those with normal serum iron.
Conclusions:
- Myocardial iron levels are reduced in heart failure patients.
- Serum iron markers, except for sTfR, do not reliably reflect myocardial iron levels.
- Reduced serum iron is associated with decreased myocardial ferritin storage in HF.
Background:
Although, correction of iron deficiency and/or anemia in heart failure (HF) with iron seems promising, little is known about myocardial iron load and homeostasis. Moreover iron supplementation indications are solely based on iron serum markers. The purpose was to assess myocardial iron (M-Iron), ferritin (M-FR), transferrin receptor (M-sTfR) in HF in relation to serum Iron markers.
Methods And Results:
Study group 33 patients, left/right ventricle (LV/RV) (LVEDV 245 ± 84 ml; LVESV 189 ± 85 ml; LVEF 22 ± 11%; RVD 32 ± 10 mm), NTproBNP (5464 ± 4825 pg/ml). Iron homeostasis assessment serum: iron, FR, transferrin/saturation (TSAT), sTfR; myocardial: M-Iron (Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis, μg/g), M-FR, M-sTfR (ELISA - ng/mg protein) in the explanted failing hearts (FH), compared to non-failing hearts (NFH n=11). In FH as compared to NFH, M-Iron was reduced in RV (174 ± 45 vs 233 ± 97, respectively, p=0.07), LV (189 ± 58 vs 265 ± 119, p=0.04), without significant changes in M-FR/M-sTfR. Out of all serum iron markers only sTfR was negatively correlated with M-Iron in either ventricle (RV r=-0.44, p=0.03, LV r=-0.38, p=0.07). With regard to serum iron status, based on TSAT, patients were divided into two subgroups: reduced (TSAT<15%; n=11) and not-reduced serum iron (TSAT ≥ 15%; n=22). Both subgroups had similar grade of LV/RV dysfunction, NT-proBNP levels. M-FR was lower in TSAT<15% than in TSAT ≥ 15% (LV -31 ± 26 vs 46 ± 29; p=0.07) and (RV -24 ± 24 vs 43 ± 29; p=0.02), without differences in M-Iron and M-sTfR.
Conclusions:
In HF, M-Iron levels were reduced. Serum iron markers did not reflect M-Iron levels, except for serum sTfR. In reduced serum iron group, decrease in myocardial storage protein M-FR was observed.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

