Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this particular...

Uncertainty: Overview

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Schemas

Schemas

A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Synergistic effects of warming and elevated CO<sub>2</sub> intensify drought impacts on grassland carbon and water fluxes.

Science advances·2026

Same author

Impacts of Precipitation Variability on Carbon Flux Dynamics of Global Semi-Arid Savannas.

Global change biology·2026

Same author

Leaf phenology affects wood anatomy in an ecosystem warming experiment.

Plant physiology·2026

Same author

The MERGE Dataset: A Harmonized Global Resource for Climate Disaster Impacts and Human Vulnerability.

Scientific data·2026

Same author

Vegetation responses to air dryness amplify future land surface warming.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Leaf temperature and its departure from ambient air temperature.

Nature plants·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The model-data fusion pitfall: assuming certainty in an uncertain world.

Trevor F Keenan¹, Mariah S Carbone, Markus Reichstein

¹Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. tkeenan@oeb.harvard.edu

|September 9, 2011

Summary

Model-data fusion integrates diverse data streams with models, improving ecological insights. Rigorous approaches must account for all uncertainties to ensure reliable results and guide future research.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Environmental biology
Ecological modeling
Data assimilation

Background:

Model-data fusion combines computational models with observational data streams.
This approach is increasingly applied in environmental biology and ecology.
Existing applications reveal model and data strengths and limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

To review and outline the fundamental principles of rigorous model-data fusion.
To emphasize the critical role of uncertainty quantification in fusion methods.
To propose a code of best practices for future model-data fusion endeavors.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature on model-data fusion techniques.
Emphasis on statistical rigor and transparency in uncertainty assessment.
Identification of key components for robust fusion frameworks.

Main Results:

Model-data fusion offers a powerful framework for ecological research.
Properly accounting for model and data uncertainties is essential for reliable outcomes.
A structured approach enhances the interpretability of fusion results.

Conclusions:

Adherence to best practices in uncertainty handling is crucial for advancing model-data fusion.
The proposed guidelines aim to improve the reliability and transparency of fusion studies.
Future research should focus on implementing statistically sound and transparent fusion methodologies.