Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Single Port Donor Nephrectomy
07:17

Single Port Donor Nephrectomy

Published on: March 12, 2011

An objective scoring system for laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Sashi S Kommu1, Amr M Emara, Philip James

  • 1STILUS Academic Research Group (SARG) Section of The Surgical Trainees Interested in Laparoscopic and Robotic Urological Surgery Group, London, United Kingdom. sashurol@gmail.com

Journal of Endourology
|September 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generating a consensus on the follow-up of multifocal high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Maternal Health and Sociodemographic Characteristics Influence Infant Growth to 24 Months in the Tunza Mwana Cohort: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Maternal & child nutrition·2026
Same author

Correction: Single-versus multi-port robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analytic study of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Single-versus multi-port robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analytic study of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Operative approaches and outcomes of nephroureterectomy for UTUC: a network meta-analysis.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Nurse prescribing of opioid agonist treatment in Ireland: Evidence, governance, and the politics of drug policy decision-making.

The International journal on drug policy·2026
Same journal

Is Nonpapillary Puncture a Feasible Alternative to Papillary Access in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Procedure, Safety, and Outcomes of Patient-Controlled Sedation in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: A 7-Year Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Benign Hyperplasia: A Preoperative Nomogram and a Postoperative Surveillance Protocol.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Bubble Trouble: The Thermal Risk of Ureteral Laser Lithotripsy in an Air Bubble.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Development of an Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥2 Complications after Unilateral Minimally Invasive Pyeloplasty in UPJO: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of endourology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Appendiceal Onlay Ureteroplasty and Appendiceal Interposition Ureteroplasty for Complex Proximal Ureteral Strictures in Children: Insights Gained from Long-Term Follow-Up.

Journal of endourology·2026
See all related articles

A new scoring system reliably assesses laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) performance, accurately predicting surgeon experience. This tool aids in evaluating surgical skills and trainee progress in minimally invasive urologic surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Education

Background:

  • Laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) is a common urologic procedure.
  • Objective scoring systems for advanced laparoscopic urologic surgery are lacking.
  • This study addresses the need for skill assessment in LN.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and test a direct observation scoring system for laparoscopic nephrectomy.
  • To assess the preliminary validity of this novel scoring system.
  • To evaluate its utility in differentiating surgeon experience levels.

Main Methods:

  • A 100-point scoring system based on 20 key steps of LN was developed.
  • A negative marking system penalized technically unsound techniques.
  • Sixty recorded LN cases were scored by four mentors; the system was validated on 30 additional cases.

More Related Videos

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:41

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: March 10, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Single Port Donor Nephrectomy
07:17

Single Port Donor Nephrectomy

Published on: March 12, 2011

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
04:41

Application of the En Bloc Concept Combined with Anatomic Resection in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Published on: March 10, 2023

Main Results:

  • Mentor scores showed high inter-rater reliability.
  • The scoring system strongly correlated with surgeon experience and seniority.
  • It accurately distinguished between experienced surgeons, fellows, and trainees at different training levels.

Conclusions:

  • The developed scoring system is a reliable tool for assessing laparoscopic nephrectomy performance.
  • It accurately predicts the surgeon's experience level.
  • This system can supplement the assessment of surgical skills and trainee progression.