Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Optimal medical therapy for coronary artery disease in 2011 - perspectives from the STICH Trial
Thomas F Whayne1, Sibu P Saha, Karla Quevedo
1Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart Institute, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. twhayn0@uky.edu
Insights
For stable coronary heart disease, optimal medical therapy and revascularization procedures offer similar protection against major cardiovascular events. The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial found no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the two approaches.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Coronary heart disease management has advanced significantly with medical, interventional, and surgical options.
- Optimal medical therapy demonstrates comparable effectiveness to revascularization in preventing major cardiovascular events for stable patients.
- The Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial is a key study in this field.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of medical therapy versus surgical revascularization for coronary heart disease.
- To evaluate the impact of different treatment strategies on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.
- To inform clinical decision-making for individual patient management.
Main Methods:
- Review of evidence for medical, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Analysis of findings from the landmark Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial.
- Consideration of patient-specific factors, quality of life, and symptom relief.
Main Results:
- Optimal medical therapy and revascularization yield similar outcomes for major cardiovascular events in stable coronary heart disease.
- The STICH trial showed no significant difference in all-cause mortality between medical therapy and medical therapy plus coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Secondary outcomes in the STICH trial indicated fewer cardiovascular deaths in the surgical group.
Conclusions:
- Both medical therapy and revascularization have distinct roles in managing coronary heart disease.
- Individualized patient care, considering patient wishes and specific clinical scenarios, is paramount.
- A collaborative 'heart team' approach is essential for optimal patient management.
Abstract:
Medical, percutaneous interventional, and surgical treatments for the management of coronary heart disease have progressed markedly during the past decade. There is evidence to suggest that for patients with stable coronary heart disease optimal medical therapy is equal in effectiveness for lowering the risk of major cardiovascular events, such as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke, as are revascularization procedures, such as coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention. The landmark Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial found no significant difference between medical therapy alone and medical therapy plus coronary artery bypass grafting with respect to the primary end point of death from any cause (all-cause mortality). However, secondary outcomes showed fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes in the surgical group versus the medical group. Medical therapy has improved over time, as have surgical techniques including myocardial preservation, and both approaches have their place, especially since chest pain relief and quality of life may benefit more in some cases by revascularization. Certainly, coronary artery bypass grafting has general acceptance for three-vessel coronary heart disease, and percutaneous coronary artery intervention is the standard of care for the involved artery in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction when the intervention can be accomplished rapidly. Medical management includes lifestyle changes that benefit coronary heart disease, drug therapy to improve prognosis, and drug therapy to improve symptoms. The key to clinical management is the selection of the procedure and/or medical management strategy that is in the best interest of the individual cardiovascular patient. In addition, discussing with patients their options and considering what best fits their wishes is especially critical when there is no clear-cut best strategy. Continued collaboration between cardiologists concentrating on medical approaches with interventionists and cardiac surgeons (heart team approach) is essential for optimal management for each individual patient.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction

