Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease
Chang-Wook Nam1, Fabio Mangiacapra, Robert Entjes
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
The functional SYNTAX score (FSS), which uses fractional flow reserve (FFR) data, better predicts major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than the standard SYNTAX score (SS) in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). This approach reclassifies many patients into lower-risk groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- The SYNTAX score (SS) is an anatomic tool for predicting outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI enhances outcomes by integrating functional data with anatomical information.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if a functional SYNTAX score (FSS), derived from FFR, offers superior clinical outcome prediction compared to the traditional SS.
- To assess the predictive value of FSS versus SS for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with multivessel CAD undergoing PCI.
Main Methods:
- The study prospectively analyzed 497 patients from the FAME study, collecting SS data.
- FSS was calculated by considering only lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80 (ischemia-producing).
- The predictive accuracy of FSS and SS for 1-year MACE was compared using statistical models.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion (32%) of patients were reclassified to a lower-risk category based on FSS.
- 1-year MACE rates were significantly different across FSS risk groups (9.0% low, 11.3% medium, 26.7% high; p < 0.001).
- FSS demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for MACE compared to SS (Harrell's C: 0.677 vs. 0.630, p=0.02), with FSS and procedure time as independent predictors.
Conclusions:
- Incorporating FFR-defined ischemia into the SS (creating FSS) reduces the number of patients classified as high-risk.
- FSS provides better risk discrimination for adverse events in multivessel CAD patients undergoing PCI than the anatomic SS alone.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
