Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Murine Model of Leukemia Relapse to Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Published on: October 17, 2025
Challenges in implementing individualized medicine illustrated by antimetabolite therapy of childhood acute
Jacob Nersting1, Louise Borst, Kjeld Schmiegelow
1Pediatric Oncology Research Laboratory, JMC-5704, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen. kjeld.schmiegelow@rh.regionh.dk.
Abstract:
Predicting the response to medical therapy and subsequently individualizing the treatment to increase efficacy or reduce toxicity has been a longstanding clinical goal. Not least within oncology, where many patients fail to be cured, and others are treated to or beyond the limit of acceptable toxicity, an individualized therapeutic approach is indicated. The mapping of the human genome and technological developments in DNA sequencing, gene expression profiling, and proteomics have raised the expectations for implementing genotype-phenotype data into the clinical decision process, but also multiplied the complex interaction of genetic and other laboratory parameters that can be used for therapy adjustments. Thus, with the advances in the laboratory techniques, post laboratory issues have become major obstacles for treatment individualization. Many of these challenges have been illustrated by studies involving childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), where each patient may receive up to 13 different anticancer agents over a period of 2-3 years. The challenges include i) addressing important, but low-frequency outcomes, ii) difficulties in interpreting the impact of single drug or single gene response data that often vary across treatment protocols, iii) combining disease and host genomics with outcome variations, and iv) physicians' reluctance in implementing potentially useful genotype and phenotype data into clinical practice, since unjustified downward or upward dose adjustments could increase the of risk of relapse or life-threatening complications. In this review we use childhood ALL therapy as a model and discuss these issues, and how they may be addressed.
Insights
Individualizing cancer therapy using genetic data is crucial. Challenges in interpreting complex genomic data and physician adoption hinder personalized treatment, as seen in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Translational Medicine
Background:
- Personalized medicine aims to tailor treatments for better efficacy and reduced toxicity, especially in oncology.
- Advances in genomic technologies offer potential for genotype-phenotype data integration into clinical decisions.
- Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment provides a model for these challenges due to complex multi-drug regimens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the challenges in implementing genotype-phenotype data for personalized cancer therapy.
- To use childhood ALL as a case study to illustrate these implementation hurdles.
- To discuss potential strategies for addressing post-laboratory issues in treatment individualization.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on personalized medicine in oncology.
- Case study analysis using childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment protocols.
- Discussion of challenges including low-frequency outcomes, data interpretation, and clinical adoption.
Main Results:
- Genomic data integration faces obstacles like interpreting single-gene/drug responses across protocols.
- Combining host/disease genomics with outcomes is complex.
- Physician reluctance and fear of adverse events impede genotype-guided dose adjustments.
Conclusions:
- Post-laboratory challenges significantly hinder personalized treatment individualization in oncology.
- Addressing data interpretation and clinical integration issues is vital for advancing precision medicine.
- Childhood ALL exemplifies the need for improved strategies to leverage genomic data in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
