Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Conducting Respiratory Oscillometry in an Outpatient Setting
Published on: April 8, 2022
Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK): clinically meaningful changes in score
Robert S Zeiger1, Michael Mellon, Bradley Chipps
1Allergy Department, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Region, San Diego, Calif 92111, USA. Robert.S.Zeiger@kp.org
Insights
A change of 10 or more points on the Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) signifies meaningful improvement in a child’s asthma control. This score change should prompt healthcare providers to reassess asthma management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Clinical Assessment Tools
- Asthma Management
Background:
- The Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) is the first validated tool for assessing asthma control in young children.
- Establishing a minimally important difference (MID) is crucial for interpreting clinical significance of TRACK score changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the minimally important difference (MID) for the TRACK questionnaire.
- To establish a threshold for clinically meaningful changes in pediatric asthma control.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, longitudinal study at 20 US pediatric sites.
- Administered TRACK to caregivers of children under 5 with asthma symptoms.
- Utilized anchor-based and distribution-based methods to calculate MID.
Main Results:
- Mean differences in TRACK scores ranged from 3.4 to 16.4 points (mean 11.1).
- A TRACK score change of 10 points or more indicated a clinically meaningful difference.
- Scores below 80 with a 10-point decrease correlated with increased odds of uncontrolled asthma.
Conclusions:
- A TRACK score change of 10 points or more represents a clinically meaningful change in respiratory control for young children.
- This threshold should prompt healthcare providers to re-evaluate asthma management in pediatric patients.
Background:
The Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids (TRACK) is the first validated questionnaire to assess respiratory and asthma control exclusively in young children.
Objective:
We sought to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for interpreting meaningful changes in individual patients' TRACK scores.
Methods:
In this prospective, nonrandomized, longitudinal study conducted at 20 US pediatric sites, TRACK was administered at 2 separate clinic visits (4-6 weeks apart) to caregivers of children aged less than 5 years with symptoms consistent with asthma. Anchor-based methods were used to determine the MID from mean score differences between patients based on multiple criteria measures: physician guidelines-based respiratory control rating, physician-recommended changes to therapy, episodes of symptoms lasting more than 24 hours in the past 3 months, oral corticosteroid use for respiratory tract illnesses in the past year, physician-assessed change in control status at follow-up, and caregiver-reported change in respiratory status. The MID also was determined from distribution-based methods.
Results:
TRACK scores were assessed at baseline (426 caregivers) and follow-up (396 caregivers). Mean differences in TRACK scores between patients differing on criteria measures ranged from 3.4 to 16.4 points (mean, 11.1 points). Distribution-based techniques confirmed these findings. Based on logistic regression analyses, scoring 10 or more points less than 80 on TRACK was associated with an approximately 2-fold increased odds of having uncontrolled asthma or respiratory symptoms.
Conclusion:
Changes in TRACK scores of 10 or more points represent clinically meaningful changes in respiratory control status in individual young children with respiratory symptoms consistent with asthma and should alert health care providers to re-evaluate asthma management.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like asthma or COPD,...
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Pulmonary Function Tests
Pulmonary Function Tests are crucial diagnostic tools for assessing respiratory function, particularly in patients with chronic respiratory disorders. They comprehensively evaluate lung volumes, ventilatory function, breathing mechanics, diffusion, and gas exchange. These tests help diagnose pulmonary diseases and play a significant role in monitoring disease progression, evaluating disability, and assessing response to therapy.
PFTs involve using a spirometer, a...
Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and key...
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History

