Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques
Published on: February 11, 2020
Contemporary evolutionary divergence for a protected species following assisted colonization
Michael L Collyer1, Jeffrey S Heilveil, Craig A Stockwell
1Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, United States of America.
Assisted colonization of White Sands pupfish created a refuge population that diverged in body shape from its native environment within 30 years. This contemporary evolution highlights unintended consequences for genetic diversity in conservation efforts.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Conservation Genetics
- Ecology
Background:
- Refuge populations established via assisted colonization are intended as genetic backups for protected species.
- These populations may undergo evolutionary divergence, losing their value as true genetic replicates.
- Contemporary evolutionary divergence in wild populations can occur on short timescales.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate contemporary evolutionary divergence in body shape within a 30-year-old refuge population of White Sands pupfish (Cyprinodon tularosa).
- To assess whether observed body shape divergence is due to phenotypic plasticity or adaptive evolution.
- To evaluate the implications of evolutionary divergence for the conservation utility of assisted colonization.
Main Methods:
- Geometric morphometrics were used to analyze body shape variation in pupfish populations.
- Experimental mesocosms simulated native high and low salinity conditions to test for phenotypic plasticity.
- Microsatellite analysis was performed to assess genetic drift in the refuge population.
Main Results:
- Body shape in White Sands pupfish is heritable, with small contributions from phenotypic plasticity.
- Refuge population exhibited significant body shape divergence compared to native populations, irrespective of experimental salinity.
- No significant genetic drift was detected in the refuge population, supporting adaptive divergence.
Conclusions:
- Assisted colonization can lead to unintended, contemporary evolutionary divergence in refuge populations.
- Relaxed or novel selection pressures in refuge habitats can drive rapid adaptive changes in morphology.
- Evolutionary divergence may compromise the long-term genetic value of refuge populations for conservation.
Related Concept Videos
Speciation Rates
Formation of Species
Genetics of Speciation
Hybrid Zones
Gene Flow
The Evidence for Evolution

