Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation01:09

Correlation

In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
Correlations02:20

Correlations

Correlation means that there is a relationship between two or more variables (such as ice cream consumption and crime), but this relationship does not necessarily imply cause and effect. When two variables are correlated, it simply means that as one variable changes, so does the other. We can measure correlation by calculating a statistic known as a correlation coefficient. A correlation coefficient is a number from -1 to +1 that indicates the strength and direction of the relationship between...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity01:22

Factors Influencing Attraction I: Proximity

Proximity plays a fundamental role in shaping interpersonal attraction by increasing opportunities for interaction and fostering familiarity. Research consistently demonstrates that individuals are more likely to form social bonds with those who are physically closer to them, whether in residential settings, workplaces, or educational institutions. This effect is largely driven by the increased frequency of encounters, which facilitates the development of friendships and romantic...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How the black hole illusion environment affects operational performance at different flight phases in aviation.

Applied ergonomics·2023
Same author

Testing the saliency-based account of phasic alertness.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2023
Same author

Vehicle crash simulations for safety: Introduction of connected and automated vehicles on the roadways.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2023
Same author

The Simon Effect Asymmetry for Left- and Right-Dominant Persons.

Journal of cognition·2023
Same author

Effects of a neutral warning signal under increased temporal uncertainty.

Memory & cognition·2023
Same author

Emotional experiences of service robots' anthropomorphic appearance: a multimodal measurement method.

Ergonomics·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Correlations between spatial compatibility effects: are arrows more like locations or words?

James D Miles1, Robert W Proctor

  • 1Psychology Department, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd., Long Beach, CA, 90840, USA. jmiles@csulb.edu

Psychological Research
|September 13, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Spatial compatibility effects differ based on task relevance. Arrows and words align when irrelevant, while arrows and locations align when relevant, showing strategic use of spatial coding.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise
06:17

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Spatial compatibility effects demonstrate enhanced performance when stimulus-response mappings align.
  • A key debate concerns whether different sensory modalities (e.g., visual, verbal) create distinct spatial representations.
  • Understanding these representations is crucial for designing intuitive interfaces and cognitive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationships between spatial compatibility effects from arrows, locations, and location words.
  • To determine if these relationships change based on task relevance (irrelevant vs. relevant spatial information).
  • To explore the strategic adaptation of spatial coding strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Simon task (irrelevant spatial information) and the stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) task (relevant spatial information).
  • Correlated spatial compatibility effects across three stimulus modes: arrows, locations, and location words.
  • Analyzed compatibility effects across different segments of the response time distribution.

Main Results:

  • When spatial information was irrelevant (Simon task), compatibility effects from arrows and words were more correlated than with locations.
  • When spatial information was relevant (SRC task), compatibility effects from arrows and locations were more correlated, and both less so with words.
  • The strength of association between different spatial stimulus modes varied significantly with task demands.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial representations are not fixed but are strategically modulated based on task relevance.
  • The brain flexibly selects and prioritizes spatial coding strategies for optimal performance.
  • Compatibility effects from one spatial mode cannot reliably predict effects in another, highlighting the dynamic nature of spatial cognition.