Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Aggression01:47

Aggression

Humans engage in aggression when they seek to cause harm or pain to another person. Aggression takes two forms depending on one’s motives: hostile or instrumental. Hostile aggression is motivated by feelings of anger with intent to cause pain; a fight in a bar with a stranger is an example of hostile aggression. In contrast, instrumental aggression is motivated by achieving a goal and does not necessarily involve intent to cause pain (Berkowitz, 1993); a contract killer who murders for hire...
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness01:14

Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness

Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
Bystander Effect02:09

Bystander Effect

The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Agreements and disagreements with resource-rational contractualism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

An ignored minority status: Consequences for sexual minorities living in a biased society.

Social and personality psychology compass·2026
Same author

Liberals and Conservatives See Different Victims: Moral Disagreement Is Explained by Different Assumptions of Vulnerability.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026
Same author

The effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on romantic couples' physiology and behavior during conflict.

Anxiety, stress, and coping·2026
Same author

Sleep/wake regularity influences how stress shapes executive function.

Frontiers in sleep·2025
Same author

Life satisfaction and blood pressure: A coordinated analysis of 16 cohorts.

Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association·2025
Same journal

Interactive effects of age and mindfulness on emotion regulation flexibility: Evidence from a daily diary study.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Childhood threat exposure and poor emotional awareness predict neural correlates of emotion regulation in adolescent girls.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Intensity, desirability, and attainability: Predictors of effort in emotion regulation among healthy and depressed individuals.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Effort shapes empathy: Distinct aftereffects of cognitive and physical exertion on pain empathy.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

An unequal exchange: A within-person examination of conversation role on intra- and interpersonal outcomes of co-ruminative conversations.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

The interdependence of emotion regulation in romantic couples: A longitudinal dyadic analysis of six strategies.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

Simulating murder: the aversion to harmful action.

Fiery Cushman1, Kurt Gray, Allison Gaffey

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA. fiery_cushman@brown.edu

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
|September 14, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Humans show a basic aversion to causing physical harm, linked to physiological responses. This study found that performing simulated harmful actions, not just witnessing them, strongly activates the body's aversion system, influencing moral decisions.

More Related Videos

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm
09:00

Investigating Pain-Related Avoidance Behavior using a Robotic Arm-Reaching Paradigm

Published on: October 3, 2020

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
06:11

A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats

Published on: February 20, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Moral Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Evidence suggests an innate human aversion to physical harm.
  • Moral decision-making is influenced by emotional and physiological factors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the physiological basis of aversion to physical harm.
  • To determine if performing simulated harmful actions elicits a stronger aversion response than witnessing them.
  • To explore the link between bodily responses and moral decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Measured peripheral vasoconstriction (a physiological index of aversion) in participants.
  • Participants engaged in simulated harmful actions (e.g., pointing a fake gun) and control tasks.
  • Compared physiological responses during simulated harm, witnessed harm, and non-harmful actions.

Main Results:

  • Unwillingness to endorse harm in moral dilemmas correlated with individual differences in aversive reactivity (peripheral vasoconstriction).
  • Performing simulated harmful actions significantly increased peripheral vasoconstriction compared to witnessing harm or performing non-harmful actions.
  • The aversion response to harm is not solely based on empathic concern for potential victims.

Conclusions:

  • Bodily responses, specifically peripheral vasoconstriction, play a crucial role in the aversion to physically harming others.
  • The act of performing simulated harm, independent of actual consequences, strongly engages the body's aversion system.
  • These findings highlight a direct link between physiological reactivity and moral decision-making processes.