Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the Guinness...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the molecular mechanisms of resveratrol in treating diabetic foot ulcers: a comprehensive analysis of network pharmacology and experiment validation.

Frontiers in molecular biosciences·2025
Same author

AuNRs-PPARγmAb Induce Targeted Adipocyte Apoptosis Through Photothermal Effects for Effective Localized Fat Reduction.

International journal of nanomedicine·2025
Same author

Correction: facilitation of diabetic wound healing by far upstream element binding protein 1 through augmentation of dermal fibroblast activity.

Acta diabetologica·2025
Same author

Facilitation of diabetic wound healing by far upstream element binding protein 1 through augmentation of dermal fibroblast activity.

Acta diabetologica·2024
Same author

Pathway-based analyses of gene expression profiles at low doses of ionizing radiation.

Frontiers in bioinformatics·2024
Same author

Optimal decision-making in high-throughput virtual screening pipelines.

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2023
Same journal

conMItion: an R package adjusting confounding factors for associations in multi-omics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaMFG: a Spatial Multi-omics Integration Method based on Feature Grouping.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

CSCN: Inference of Cell-Specific Causal Networks Using Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Sparse CCA-Based Mediation Analysis with High-Dimensional Exposures and Mediators.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Cross-Context Generalization in Drug Perturbation Prediction with a Multimodal Conditional Diffusion Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Primer Design through Submodular Function Estimation.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

High-dimensional bolstered error estimation.

Chao Sima1, Ulisses M Braga-Neto, Edward R Dougherty

  • 1Computational Biology Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|September 15, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bolstered error estimation, effective in small samples, faces challenges in high-dimensional spaces. This study introduces an optimal kernel variance calculation for improved performance in complex feature spaces.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Machine Learning
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Bolstered error estimation outperforms cross-validation and bootstrap in small samples.
  • Optimal kernel variance is crucial for bolstering performance.
  • Current methods struggle in high-dimensional feature spaces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compute an optimal kernel variance for bolstered error estimation.
  • To address performance degradation in high-dimensional settings.
  • To develop a robust method for selecting kernel variance in real-world applications.

Main Methods:

  • Calculating optimal kernel variance based on classification rule, sample size, and feature space.
  • Investigating the impact of feature selection on optimal variance.
  • Demonstrating the robustness of the optimal variance relative to the model.

Main Results:

  • An optimal kernel variance is computed, dependent on classification rule, sample size, and feature space.
  • The optimal variance is robust with respect to the classification model.
  • A practical method for selecting kernel variance is proposed for unknown models.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method enhances bolstered error estimation in high-dimensional data.
  • Optimal kernel variance selection improves accuracy and reliability.
  • This approach facilitates broader application of bolstering techniques.