Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules

Reinforcement Schedules

Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

Primary and Secondary Reinforcers

In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic

The correlation between a drug's dosage and its impact on a biological system is a cornerstone of pharmacology and toxicology. Conventional dose–response curves, which include graded and quantal relationships, are key to this understanding. Graded dose–response curves depict the spectrum of a biological reaction to different doses within an individual, indicating that as the drug dosage increases, so does the intensity of the response. On the other hand, quantal dose–response relationships...

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive Theory: Pull Theory of Motivation

Incentive theory, or the "pull theory" of motivation, suggests that external rewards primarily drive behavior. Individuals are motivated to engage in activities when they anticipate a desirable outcome. This is why people often work hard for promotions or study intensively to achieve high grades. These incentives can be tangible, physical rewards such as money or promotions, or intangible, non-physical rewards like praise and social recognition.
The theory differentiates between intrinsic and...

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Crawling into a hole: Attachment insecurity, shame, and hikikomori symptoms in an adolescent population.

Acta psychologica·2026

Same author

The Joy and the Pain of Being Alone: Managing the Solitude-Loneliness (SOLO) Paradox in People High on the Autism Spectrum.

Clinical child and family psychology review·2026

Same author

Reliability of Electrophysiological Measures of Cognitive Control and Sociodemographic Correlates in a Large Adolescent and Emerging Adult Cohort.

Psychophysiology·2026

Same author

Initial Validation of the Dutch Translation of the Caregiver Wish List: An Interview-Based Scale for Measuring Parenting Practices.

SAGE open·2026

Same author

Which personality traits are necessary conditions for problematic alcohol use? Insights from a 23-year longitudinal study.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026

Same author

Sexual hallucinations and delusions in borderline personality disorder.

Frontiers in psychiatry·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

A new scale for measuring reward responsiveness.

Ivo Van den Berg¹, Ingmar H A Franken, Peter Muris

¹Institute of Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Frontiers in Psychology

|September 17, 2011

Summary

A new scale effectively measures reward responsiveness (RR), a key behavioral system. This psychometrically sound instrument is independent of punishment sensitivity and suitable for personality research.

Keywords:

approach and activation reliability reward responsiveness scale validity

More Related Videos

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

A Simple Way to Measure Alterations in Reward-seeking Behavior Using Drosophila melanogaster

A Simple Way to Measure Alterations in Reward-seeking Behavior Using Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 15, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans

Published on: March 19, 2014

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Three Laboratory Procedures for Assessing Different Manifestations of Impulsivity in Rats

Published on: March 17, 2019

A Simple Way to Measure Alterations in Reward-seeking Behavior Using Drosophila melanogaster

A Simple Way to Measure Alterations in Reward-seeking Behavior Using Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 15, 2016

Area of Science:

Psychology
Neuroscience
Behavioral Science

Background:

Psychological theories propose two core behavioral systems: avoidance (punishment-sensitive) and approach (reward-sensitive).
Existing self-report scales for reward responsiveness (RR) have limitations.
Validated instruments are crucial for research in personality, psychopathology, and biology.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and psychometrically evaluate a new scale for measuring reward responsiveness (RR).
To ensure the new scale is independent of punishment sensitivity.
To provide a reliable tool for assessing the personality construct of RR.

Main Methods:

Development of a new self-report scale for reward responsiveness (RR).
Extensive psychometric evaluation, including internal consistency, validity (convergent, discriminant), and reliability (test-retest).
Analysis of the scale's factor structure and predictive properties.

Main Results:

The new RR scale measures a single factor, clearly independent of punishment sensitivity.
Adequate internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and test-retest reliability were demonstrated.
The scale exhibited satisfactory predictive properties.

Conclusions:

The newly developed RR scale is a psychometrically sound instrument.
This validated scale can be effectively utilized by researchers studying reward responsiveness.
The findings support the use of this scale in personality research and related fields.