Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity01:25

Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity

Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity refer to the ability of drugs to cause genetic defects and induce cancer, respectively. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies agents into four groups based on their carcinogenic potential. Group 1 agents are known human carcinogens; group 2A agents are probably carcinogenic to humans; group 3 agents lack data to support their role in carcinogenesis; and group 4 includes agents for which data support that they are not likely to be...
Toxicokinetics: Overview01:21

Toxicokinetics: Overview

Studies that assess how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted (ADME) at toxic doses are termed toxicokinetics. Understanding toxicokinetics helps predict adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and manage toxicity in humans.Toxicokinetics differs from pharmacokinetics mainly in the dose levels studied, with toxicokinetics focusing on higher toxic doses. The kinetics at these levels can be non-linear due to altered physiological processes. Toxicodynamics examines the relationship...
Teratogenicity01:07

Teratogenicity

The ability of a drug to produce structural deformations and functional abnormalities in the developing embryo or the fetus is called teratogenicity, and the drug producing this effect is known as a teratogen. Teratogenic effects include stillbirth, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, and neurocognitive delay. A teratogen may affect the embryo at different stages of development, which is important in determining the type and extent of the damage. During blastocyst formation, the early...
Drug Regulation01:25

Drug Regulation

Drug regulation encompasses the management of drug usage by evaluating its safety and efficacy through assessments conducted by regulatory authorities. Regrettably, the history of drug regulation is marred by several catastrophic events. One such incident is the Elixir Sulfanilamide tragedy, in which the toxic compound diethyl glycol was included in a sweet-tasting medication, leading to numerous fatalities. This event prompted the enactment of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1938. Under...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A more complete picture: capturing single nucleotide variant diversity in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> using post-enrichment metagenomics.

Microbial genomics·2026
Same author

Quantifying the bystander effect of antimicrobial use on the gut microbiome and resistome in Malawian adults.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

In vitro and in situ analysis of novel copper-based antimicrobial surface coatings designed to reduce the microbial bioburden of high-touch surfaces in a hospital environment.

The Journal of hospital infection·2025
Same author

Model-based methods for hospital infection prevention and control: potential and challenges.

BMC global and public health·2025
Same author

An evaluation of screening methods for the detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in environmental samples from healthcare settings.

Journal of applied microbiology·2025
Same author

Health system drivers of antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative exploration of implications for infection prevention and control in hospitals and long-term care facilities in Merseyside.

The Journal of hospital infection·2025
Same journal

Developmental toxicity studies of lumefantrine and artemether in rats and rabbits.

Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology·2016
Same journal

Lost in translation: The search for an in vitro screen for spermatogenic toxicity.

Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology·2016
Same journal

Exposure to high-concentration oxygen in the neonatal period induces abnormal retinal vascular patterning in mice.

Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology·2016
Same journal

Effect of fructose on the phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase in HepG2 cells stimulated with placental lactogen.

Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology·2016
Same journal

Reproductive and neurobehavioral effects of maternal exposure to piperonyl butoxide (PBO) in F<sub>1</sub> -generation mice.

Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology·2016
Same journal

Goldilocks' Determination of What New In Vivo Data are "Just Right" for Different Common Drug Development Scenarios, Part 1.

Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology·2016
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation
17:28

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation

Published on: June 17, 2015

Current and future needs for developmental toxicity testing.

Susan L Makris1, James H Kim, Amy Ellis

  • 1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Washington, District of Columbia. makris.susan@epa.gov

Birth Defects Research. Part B, Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology
|September 17, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Developmental toxicity testing is crucial for assessing human health risks from various products. New technologies offer enhanced screening and risk assessment, improving upon traditional methods.

More Related Videos

Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
05:45

Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Published on: October 10, 2025

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation
17:28

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Based Developmental Toxicity Assays for Chemical Safety Screening and Systems Biology Data Generation

Published on: June 17, 2015

Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
05:45

Developmental Toxicity Assay Based on Real-Time Monitoring of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Disruption in Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Published on: October 10, 2025

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster
07:02

Assessment of Chemical Toxicity in Adult Drosophila Melanogaster

Published on: March 24, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Developmental toxicity testing is integral to regulatory risk assessment for pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and consumer products.
  • Current in vivo study designs for hazard characterization and dose-response assessment have remained largely unchanged for decades.
  • Existing methods are well-established but present opportunities for modernization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current use of developmental toxicity testing in regulatory assessments.
  • To explore opportunities for incorporating new technologies and innovative approaches into developmental toxicology.
  • To evaluate the potential benefits of evolving testing paradigms for regulatory decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices in developmental toxicity testing across various regulatory bodies.
  • Identification and discussion of emerging technologies and alternative approaches (in vitro, nonmammalian species, in silico).
  • Analysis of the potential impact of these advancements on the existing regulatory assessment framework.

Main Results:

  • Developmental toxicology data are essential for screening, evaluation, labeling, and hazard characterization of numerous substances.
  • Traditional in vivo study designs remain the cornerstone of current regulatory assessments.
  • New technologies offer potential for faster screening, reduced resource commitment, and deeper mechanistic understanding.

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating new technologies and approaches can enhance developmental toxicology testing efficiency and effectiveness.
  • Advancements may refine risk assessment by improving understanding of developmental toxicity mechanisms.
  • The evolution of testing paradigms must maintain the utility of developmental toxicology data for regulatory needs.