Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Detection and Isolation of Campylobacter spp. from Raw Meat
Published on: February 23, 2024
Enrichment culture can bias the isolation of Campylobacter subtypes
L K Williams1, L C Sait, T A Cogan
1School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford, UK. lisa.williams@bristol.ac.uk
Abstract:
Enrichment culture is often used to isolate Campylobacter. This study compared isolation of Campylobacter spp. from 119 broiler chicken environments from two farms, using Preston and modified Exeter (mExeter) and modified Bolton (mBolton) enrichments. mExeter was significantly more effective in isolating Campylobacter spp. from the environmental samples compared to Preston (P<0.001) and mBolton (P<0.04) broths but there was no significant difference between the latter two methods (P>0.05). Enrichment broth type did not affect isolation from chicken faecal or soil and litter samples. C. jejuni was isolated from significantly more environmental samples using mExeter broth compared to Preston (P<0.01) and mBolton (P<0.003) broths; there was no difference between the latter two methods or between all methods for detection of C. coli (P>0.05). Only C. coli was isolated from the soil and litter samples and although both C. jejuni and C. coli were recovered from the faecal samples there was no effect of using different enrichment broths. The majority of samples where the same species had been isolated yielded the same or closely related genotypes as defined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Isolates recovered using Preston and mBolton broths were less genetically diverse than those from mExeter broth. We conclude that the enrichment method used affects both the number and species of Campylobacter isolated from naturally contaminated samples.
Related Concept Videos
Techniques for Isolation of Pure Cultures
Need for Obtaining Pure Cultures
Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation
Antibiotic Selection

