Baseline trajectories of heavy drinking and their effects on postrandomization drinking in the COMBINE Study: empirically derived predictors of drinking outcomes during treatment
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

The Motivation for Alcohol Reward: Predictors of Progressive-Ratio Intravenous Alcohol Self-Administration in Humans
Published on: April 28, 2022
Ralitza Gueorguieva1, Ran Wu, Dennis Donovan
1Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. ralitza.gueorguieva@yale.edu
Abstract:
The Combined Pharmacotherapies and Behavioral Interventions (COMBINE) Study sought to answer questions about the benefits of combining behavioral and pharmacological interventions (naltrexone and acamprosate) in alcohol-dependent patients. Our goals were to identify trajectories of heavy drinking before randomization in COMBINE, to characterize patients in these trajectories, and to assess whether prerandomization trajectories predict drinking outcomes. We analyzed daily indicators of heavy drinking 90 days before randomization using a trajectory-based approach. Each patient was assigned to the most likely prerandomization heavy-drinking trajectory, and the baseline characteristics of participants in the baseline trajectories were compared. The main and interactive effects of these trajectories and treatment factors (acamprosate, naltrexone, or combined behavioral intervention) on summary drinking measures during active treatment (16 weeks) were assessed. We identified five trajectories of heavy drinking prerandomization: "T1: frequent heavy drinkers"; "T2: very frequent heavy drinkers"; "T3: nearly daily heavy drinkers"; "T4: daily heavy drinkers"; and "T5: daily heavy drinkers stopping early" before randomization. Trajectory membership was significantly associated with all drinking outcomes. Patients in "T5: daily heavy drinkers stopping early" had comparable drinking outcomes to those in "T1: frequent heavy drinkers," whereas the remaining trajectories were associated with significantly worse outcomes. The baseline trajectory did not interact significantly with the treatment condition. These exploratory analyses confirmed the hypothesis that baseline trajectories predict postrandomization drinking outcomes. Interestingly, "T5: daily heavy drinkers stopping early" had outcomes that were comparable to the least severe baseline trajectory "T1: frequent heavy drinkers," and baseline trajectories of heavy drinking did not moderate the treatment effects.
More Related Videos
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
08:45Modeling Alcohol Consumption in Rodents Using Two-Bottle Choice Home Cage Drinking and Microstructural Analysis
Published on: November 8, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Regression Toward the Mean
Experimental Designs
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Longitudinal Research
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...