Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026
Heterotypic Three-dimensional In Vitro Modeling of Stromal-Epithelial Interactions During Ovarian Cancer Initiation and Progression
Published on: August 28, 2012
Improved classification of epithelial ovarian cancer: results of 3 danish cohorts
Karina Dahl Steffensen1, Marianne Waldstrøm, Anni Grove
1Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark. Karina.Dahl.Steffensen@slb.regionsyddanmark.dk
Objective:
An increasing body of evidence has suggested that epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients can broadly be divided into 2 groups on the basis of histopathologic parameters and molecular profiles. Type 1 tumors are slow-growing tumors with inherent mutations such as KRAS or BRAF mutations, whereas type 2 tumors are more rapidly growing tumors of which many contain TP53 mutations. In the present study, we performed a comprehensive study in a large Danish material to evaluate the clinical importance.
Materials And Methods:
A total of 512 tissue samples were included (430 EOCs, 34 borderline, 28 benign tumors, and 20 normal ovaries). KRAS mutations (codon 12/13) and BRAF codon 600 mutations were analyzed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue by ARMS qPCR. p53 expression was examined by immunohistochemistry.
Results:
Of the EOC patients, 25% had histopathologically classified type 1 tumors, and of these, 44% were either KRAS or BRAF mutated. Of patients with histopathologic type 2 tumors, 66% showed p53 protein overexpression, whereas 4 (1.5%) patients contained a KRAS mutation. In a univariate survival analysis, a large difference in survival was seen between patients with type 1 and type 2 tumors. Patients with type histologic 2 tumors had significantly worse survival compared with patients with type 1 tumors (P < 10). International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, tumor grade, residual tumor, and KRAS/BRAF mutation were independent predictors of overall survival in the multivariate analysis. Patients with KRAS/BRAF mutated carcinomas showed independent decreased overall survival with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.57; P = 0.018).
Conclusions:
KRAS/BRAF mutations are with very few exceptions constrained to patients with histopathologic type 1 tumors, whereas p53 overexpression is very frequent in type 2 tumors. KRAS/BRAF mutations had independent prognostic importance. The classification presented here should have a major therapeutic implication and serve as a hallmark of future clinical trials.
