Related Experiment Videos
The long, steep path to equality: progressing on egalitarian goals
1Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. nikkimann@gmail.com
Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
|September 21, 2011
Summary
Receiving feedback on progress toward egalitarian goals unexpectedly increased racial bias. Participants showed more prejudice and discrimination after believing they were becoming more egalitarian.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Social Cognition
- Intergroup Relations
Background:
- Understanding the psychological underpinnings of racial bias is crucial for addressing societal inequalities.
- Previous research has explored factors influencing prejudice, but the impact of perceived progress on social goals remains less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how perceived progress toward egalitarian goals influences subsequent racial bias.
- To examine the effects of this feedback on intergroup behavior, attitudes, and implicit racial prejudice.
Main Methods:
- A novel bogus pipeline procedure was employed to provide participants with false feedback on their progress toward egalitarian goals.
- Three studies assessed the impact of this feedback (progress, failure, or no feedback) on measures of outgroup discrimination, ingroup favoritism, and implicit racial attitudes.
Main Results:
- Participants receiving feedback indicating progress on egalitarian goals exhibited significantly greater racial bias compared to those receiving failure feedback or no feedback.
- This increased bias manifested as greater physical distancing from Black individuals, closer proximity to White individuals, and heightened implicit racial prejudice.
Conclusions:
- Perceived progress on egalitarian goals can paradoxically lead to increased racial bias, challenging existing theories of prejudice.
- Findings highlight the complex interplay between social goals, self-perception, and intergroup attitudes, with implications for interventions aimed at reducing bias.
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Relationship Growth
Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
Robbers Cave
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Inequalities
Inequalities express mathematical relationships where two values are not equal and are compared using symbols such as <, >, ≤, or ≥. These expressions define a range of possible solutions rather than a single value. Interval notation provides a concise way to express these solution sets, especially when the variable spans a continuous range. An open interval, written as (a, b), excludes the endpoints, while a closed interval [a, b] includes them. There are also half-open intervals, such...
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
Inclusive Fitness
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.