Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
Anti-thrombotic therapy in infective endocarditis
Thomas Vanassche1, Willy E Peetermans, Marie-Christine Herregods
1Center for Molecular and Vascular Biology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. thomas.vanassche@med.kuleuven.be
Insights
Infective endocarditis (IE) poses significant risks, with embolization being a key complication. Anti-thrombotic treatments show promise in models but clinical data remain conflicting, though continuation is safe if no bleeding occurs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Hematology
Background:
- Infective endocarditis (IE) remains a serious condition with high morbidity and mortality.
- Systemic and central nervous system (CNS) embolization are major determinants of adverse outcomes in IE.
- IE vegetations involve complex interactions between pathogens, platelets, and the coagulation system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review experimental and clinical data on anti-thrombotic treatment in infective endocarditis.
- To summarize current guidelines regarding anti-thrombotic therapy in IE.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of anti-thrombotic strategies in preventing embolic complications.
Main Methods:
- Review of experimental studies (in vitro and animal models) on anti-platelet and anti-coagulant effects in IE.
- Analysis of available clinical studies investigating anti-thrombotic treatments for IE.
- Summary of current international guidelines for IE management.
Main Results:
- Anti-platelet and anti-coagulant strategies impact IE vegetation formation and embolization in experimental models.
- Clinical study results on the efficacy of anti-thrombotic treatments in IE are conflicting.
- Continuation of existing anti-thrombotic treatment is considered safe in IE patients without hemorrhagic complications.
Conclusions:
- Early diagnosis, prompt antibiotic therapy, and judicious surgical intervention are crucial for preventing embolic complications in IE.
- While anti-thrombotic treatments show potential, their clinical application in IE requires further clarification due to conflicting data.
- Current guidelines suggest that continuing anti-thrombotic therapy is safe for IE patients with other indications, provided no bleeding occurs.
Abstract:
Despite advances in medical and surgical treatment, infective endocarditis (IE) still carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. One of the determinants of an adverse outcome is the presence of systemic embolization and in particular, of CNS embolization. IE vegetations consist of bacteria, platelets and inflammatory cells in a fibrin mesh. The interactions between pathogens, platelets and the coagulation system are critical to vegetation initiation and growth. This understanding has led to the study of the effect of anti-thrombotic treatment on IE vegetation formation and embolization. Although it has been demonstrated that antiplatelet and anticoagulant strategies have an impact on in vitro and animal models of IE, results from the available clinical studies are conflicting. In this article, we provide an overview of the available experimental and clinical data on anti-thrombotic treatment in IE and summarize the current guidelines. An early diagnosis, prompt empiric antibiotic treatment and a careful selection of patients who benefit from early surgical intervention remain essential in the prevention of embolic complications. In patients who have other indications for antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment, the continuation of this treatment is deemed safe in the absence of hemorrhagic complications.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
