Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
A mobile compression device compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in
Mary E Hardwick1, Pamela A Pulido, Clifford W Colwell
1Shiley Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education at Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Introduction:
Prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), has been at the forefront of orthopaedic care for many years for lower extremity arthroplasty, which is at high risk for VTE. Risk of bleeding increases in total hip arthroplasty (THA) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis. A mobile compression device (MCD) that allows patients to move freely in hospital and at home may be safer.
Hypothesis:
The study hypothesized that patients using MCD would have less major bleeding than patients using LMWH without affecting the efficacy of thrombosis prevention in THA.
Sample:
Following THA, 395 patients at 9 healthcare sites in the United States were randomized to receive either MCD or LMWH for VTE prophylaxis.
Methods:
A mobile compression device was applied in the operating room and continued for 10 days with or without aspirin 81 mg daily. Low-molecular-weight heparin was started the morning after surgery and continued for 10 days. Days 10-12 following surgery, bilateral duplex ultrasound was performed on all patients. Bleeding events were recorded during treatment and VTE events were recorded for 3 months. Number of hours of device use was recorded.
Findings:
Major bleeding events occurred in 11 patients, all in the LMWH group (6%). Venous thromboembolism occurrence was similar, 5.1% in the MCD group and 5.3% in the LMWH group. The MCD group used the device 83% of possible usable time.
Discussion:
Findings of significantly less major bleeding in the MCD group than the LMWH group supported our hypothesis with no significant difference in VTE.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...