Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning the rules of collective cell migration using deep attention networks.

PLoS computational biology·2022
Same author

Asking the Right Questions about Research with Nonhuman Primates.

AJOB neuroscience·2021
Same author

[Outpatient Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents with Intellectual Disability].

Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie·2018
Same author

Locked Out.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2017
Same author

Help, hope, and hype: Ethical dimensions of neuroprosthetics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2017
Same author

On balance: weighing harms and benefits in fundamental neurological research using nonhuman primates.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2015
Same journal

Neuroimaging in older-age bipolar disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Pharmacological maintenance treatment in older age bipolar disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Harmful behaviours and suicide in later life bipolar disorder.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Urbanization, wildfire exposure, and youth mental health: a narrative review.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Bipolar disorder and the risk of developing dementia - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

Conceptual and ethical issues with brain-hardware interfaces.

Jens Clausen1

  • 1Institute for Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. jens.clausen@uni-tuebingen.de

Current Opinion in Psychiatry
|September 22, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Advancements in neuroscience and technology enable new brain-computer interfaces. Ongoing ethical discussions are crucial for the responsible development and application of these powerful neural recording and stimulation devices.

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare
06:34

A Single-Channel and Non-Invasive Wearable Brain-Computer Interface for Industry and Healthcare

Published on: July 7, 2023

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces
10:51

An Experimental Platform to Study the Closed-loop Performance of Brain-machine Interfaces

Published on: March 10, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biotechnology
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Neuroscience progress, computational power, and micro-technology miniaturization drive innovation in brain function understanding and neural device development.
  • Neural recording and stimulating devices present significant conceptual and ethical challenges.
  • Ethical considerations are paramount for both research and clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the ethical questions surrounding brain-computer interfaces.
  • To highlight ethical debates concerning neural stimulating devices, particularly deep brain stimulation.
  • To examine ethical implications of neural recording devices on patient autonomy and responsibility.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of ethical discussions on neural recording and stimulating devices.
  • Analysis of ethical debates in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease and other conditions.
  • Examination of ethical issues related to clinical research and innovation with neural technologies.

Main Results:

  • Ethical debates for stimulating devices often center on patient benefit, unintended consequences, and identity changes, especially in deep brain stimulation.
  • Deep brain stimulation is being explored for diverse conditions, increasing ethical focus on research and innovation.
  • Neural recording devices raise core ethical concerns regarding patient autonomy and responsibility.

Conclusions:

  • Brain-hardware interfaces require continuous ethical deliberation.
  • Responsible development and application are key to harnessing the full potential of these technologies.
  • Avoiding hasty implementation is essential to mitigate ethical risks.