[Investigation of the efficacy of some disinfectants against nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp.

Müjde Eryılmaz1, Ahmet Akın, Ozay Arıkan Akan

  • 1Ankara University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey. eryilmaz@pharmacy.ankara.edu.tr

Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni
|September 22, 2011
PubMed

Insights

Nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. showed susceptibility to glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine, and 2-propanol disinfectants. However, hydrogen peroxide demonstrated variable efficacy, with some resistant strains identified.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Nosocomial infections pose a significant global health challenge, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality.
  • Bacteria causing these infections often exhibit resistance to routine disinfectants, necessitating efficacy assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the susceptibility of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA and MSSA) and Enterococcus spp. to various disinfectants.
  • To determine the effectiveness of common disinfectants against clinically relevant nosocomial pathogens.

Main Methods:

  • Quantitative suspension tests were performed on 30 S. aureus and 21 Enterococcus spp. isolates.
  • Isolates were exposed to glutaraldehyde (2%), chlorhexidine gluconate (4%), 2-propanol (70%), povidone iodine (7.5% and 10%), and hydrogen peroxide (3%) at 3, 5, and 10-minute contact times.

Main Results:

  • All tested isolates were susceptible to glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine, and 2-propanol across all contact times.
  • Hydrogen peroxide (3%) showed variable efficacy, with some S. aureus and Enterococcus isolates demonstrating resistance, particularly at shorter contact times.

Conclusions:

  • Glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine, and 2-propanol are effective disinfectants against nosocomial S. aureus and Enterococcus spp.
  • Hydrogen peroxide (3%) is not recommended for routine use against these pathogens due to observed resistance in some strains.

Related Concept Videos

Antimicrobial Effectiveness01:28

Antimicrobial Effectiveness

The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
Hand hygiene01:23

Hand hygiene

Asepsis is the practice of preventing or breaking the chain of infection. The nurse employs aseptic techniques to prevent the spread of microorganisms and reduce the risk of diseases. Hand hygiene is the cornerstone of aseptic techniques and is classified into medical and surgical asepsis. Medical asepsis includes hand hygiene and the use of gloves. Surgical asepsis, or the sterile technique, refers to practices that render and keep objects and areas free of microorganisms.
Hand washing...
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance01:25

Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presents a critical public health threat, arising from its capacity to resist β-lactam antibiotics due to acquisition of the mecA gene within the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). This gene encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which impairs binding efficacy of methicillin and other β-lactams. MRSA has evolved into distinct clonal lineages impacting humans and animals alike, reinforcing its significance within the One...