Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
[Investigation of the efficacy of some disinfectants against nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp.
Müjde Eryılmaz1, Ahmet Akın, Ozay Arıkan Akan
1Ankara University Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ankara, Turkey. eryilmaz@pharmacy.ankara.edu.tr
Abstract:
Nosocomial infections which exhibit an increasing trend worldwide, are important contributors to morbidity and mortality. Most bacteria that cause nosocomial infections can retain their viability even after exposure to disinfectants in routine practice. This study was conducted to determine the susceptibilities of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. isolates to various disinfectants. A total of 30 S.aureus [16 were methicillin-resistant (MRSA), 14 were methicillin-susceptible (MSSA)] and 21 Enterococcus spp. (13 E.faecalis, 7 E.faecium, 1 non-typable Enterococcus spp.) strains isolated from clinical samples of hospitalized patients as nosocomial infection agents in the Central Microbiology Laboratory of Ibn-i Sina Hospital, Ankara University, Faculty of Medicine, were included in the study. Glutaraldehyde (2% wt/vol), chlorhexidine gluconate (4% wt/vol), 2-propanol (70% vol/vol), povidone iodine (7.5% wt/vol), povidone iodine (10% wt/vol) and hydrogen peroxide (3% wt/vol) susceptibilities of the isolates were investigated by quantitative suspension test at contact times of 3, 5, and 10 minutes. All of the isolates were found susceptible to glutaraldehyde (2%), chlorhexidine gluconate (4%), povidone iodine (7.5%), povidone iodine (10%) and 2-propanol (70%) at all tested contact times. However, 12 S.aureus (5 MSSA, 7 MRSA) and 3 enterococci (2 E.faecium, 1 E.faecalis) isolates were found susceptible to hydrogen peroxide (3%) at 3 minutes contact time; 11 S.aureus (4 MSSA, 7 MRSA) and 7 E.faecalis isolates were found susceptible at 5 minutes contact time, and 6 S.aureus (4 MSSA, 2 MRSA) and 3 enterococci (1 E.faecium, 2 E.faecalis) isolates were found susceptible at 10 minutes contact time. One MSSA and 8 enterococci (4 E.faecium, 3 E.faecalis, 1 Enterococcus spp.) isolates were found resistant to hydrogen peroxide (3%) at 10 minutes contact time. In conclusion, glutaraldehyde (2%), chlorhexidine gluconate (4%), povidone iodine (7.5%), povidone iodine (10%) and 2-propanol (70%) can be safely used against S.aureus and Enterococcus spp. owing to their high effectiveness, however, hydrogen peroxide (3%) should not be preferred against those strains due to the presence of resistant isolates, in Ankara University Ibn-i Sina Hospital.
Insights
Nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp. showed susceptibility to glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine, and 2-propanol disinfectants. However, hydrogen peroxide demonstrated variable efficacy, with some resistant strains identified.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Public Health
Background:
- Nosocomial infections pose a significant global health challenge, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality.
- Bacteria causing these infections often exhibit resistance to routine disinfectants, necessitating efficacy assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the susceptibility of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus (including MRSA and MSSA) and Enterococcus spp. to various disinfectants.
- To determine the effectiveness of common disinfectants against clinically relevant nosocomial pathogens.
Main Methods:
- Quantitative suspension tests were performed on 30 S. aureus and 21 Enterococcus spp. isolates.
- Isolates were exposed to glutaraldehyde (2%), chlorhexidine gluconate (4%), 2-propanol (70%), povidone iodine (7.5% and 10%), and hydrogen peroxide (3%) at 3, 5, and 10-minute contact times.
Main Results:
- All tested isolates were susceptible to glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine, and 2-propanol across all contact times.
- Hydrogen peroxide (3%) showed variable efficacy, with some S. aureus and Enterococcus isolates demonstrating resistance, particularly at shorter contact times.
Conclusions:
- Glutaraldehyde, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone iodine, and 2-propanol are effective disinfectants against nosocomial S. aureus and Enterococcus spp.
- Hydrogen peroxide (3%) is not recommended for routine use against these pathogens due to observed resistance in some strains.
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
