Psychic aftershocks: crisis counseling and disaster relief policy

Though crisis counseling following disasters has become a commonplace in the 21st century, we have little to no sense of how and when it became part of federally supported disaster relief services. In 1974, as part of a broad overhaul of federal disaster policy, an authorization to fund counseling services, and mental health training to disaster relief workers, was inserted into the Disaster Relief Act passed in that year--despite little to no empirical evidence that such counseling was necessary or effective. As this article demonstrates, unlike the drive for community mental health programs at mid-century, federal support for disaster mental health did not come as a result of a long campaign waged from well-connected institutions. Rather, it was largely the result of local practitioners, informed by larger currents in thinking about crisis intervention, who discerned these needs in a spontaneous and ad hoc manner. Disaster mental health services came into being thanks to the flourishing of a broad network of therapeutic practitioners in places as far flung as Rapid City, South Dakota, Wilkes-Barre Pennsylvania, and Logan County, West Virginia, who implemented mental health pilot projects in response to disasters in the early 1970s. Their efforts caught the attention of journalists already attuned to therapeutic discourse, and to sympathetic national legislators, to whom the proposition that disaster victims would suffer from psychological damage simply seemed like common sense and a logical service to include as part of a general broadening of federal assistance to disaster victims.