Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development

Kohlberg's theory of moral development uses the Heinz dilemma — a thought experiment in which a man, Heinz, must decide whether to steal an unaffordable drug to save his dying wife — to illustrate the evolution of moral reasoning. This framework, divided into three levels with two stages, highlights how individuals' understanding of right and wrong becomes increasingly complex.
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics and Bioethics

Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

Clinically Relevant Drug Product Specifications: Methods of Establishment

Product specifications define the acceptable quality of a pharmaceutical product by ensuring identity, purity, potency, and strength. These specifications serve as benchmarks during development, manufacturing, and post-approval quality control. Clinically relevant specifications are particularly important because they directly relate to a drug's safety and efficacy in clinical use.Dissolution studies are critical biopharmaceutic tools that link in vitro behavior to in vivo performance. They...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare.

Journal of medical ethics·2022

Same author

[Effectiveness and Ethical Evaluation of Nudging to Promote the Self-Management in Diabetes Mellitus Type 2].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2022

Same author

30 Years Principles of biomedical ethics: introduction to a symposium on the 6th edition of Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress' seminal work.

Journal of medical ethics·2011

Same author

30 years Principles of biomedical ethics: introduction to a symposium on the 6th edition of Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress' seminal work.

Journal of medical ethics·2011

Same author

Applying the four-principle approach.

Bioethics·2009

Same author

Common morality: comment on Beauchamp and Childress.

Theoretical medicine and bioethics·2008

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Specification and other methods for determining morally relevant facts.

Oliver Rauprich¹

¹Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Markstrasse 258a, Bochum, Germany.

Journal of Medical Ethics

|September 23, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study defends specification in biomedical ethics, arguing it is essential for applied ethics despite acknowledged limitations. It shows specification and casuistry share similarities, urging stronger defense of the former.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Enhanced Genetic Analysis of Single Human Bioparticles Recovered by Simplified Micromanipulation from Forensic ‘Touch DNA’ Evidence

Published on: March 9, 2015

Area of Science:

Biomedical Ethics
Applied Ethics
Moral Philosophy

Background:

The principlist approach in biomedical ethics, by Beauchamp and Childress, integrates "specification" as a key method.
Critics argue that specification has significant limitations and is insufficient for applied ethics.
Beauchamp and Childress acknowledge these limitations, but their emphasis may inadvertently support critics' views.

Purpose of the Study:

To defend the method of "specification" against critiques, particularly Carson Strong's.
To demonstrate the indispensable nature of specification for applied ethics.
To encourage a more vigorous endorsement and defense of specification by Beauchamp and Childress.

Main Methods:

Analysis of Beauchamp and Childress' principlist approach and the role of specification.
Critique of Carson Strong's casuistic approach.
Comparative analysis of specification and casuistry, highlighting structural and functional similarities.

Main Results:

Carson Strong's casuistic approach exhibits significant structural and functional similarities to specification.
The limitations acknowledged by Beauchamp and Childress do not invalidate the core utility of specification.
Specification, or similar methods for identifying morally relevant facts, is crucial for applied ethics.

Conclusions:

Specification is a vital and defensible method in biomedical and applied ethics.
The perceived weaknesses of specification are outweighed by its necessity in ethical analysis.
Beauchamp and Childress should more strongly advocate for specification's role in ethical decision-making.