Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

05:01
A Pathway Association Study Tool for GWAS Analyses of Metabolic Pathway Information
Published on: July 1, 2020
Evaluation of genome-wide selection efficiency in maize nested association mapping populations
Zhigang Guo1, Dominic M Tucker, Jianwei Lu
1Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc., Cornwallis Road, 3054 E, Research Triangle Park, NC 27705-2257, USA. zhigang.guo@syngenta.com
TAG. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. Theoretische Und Angewandte Genetik
|September 23, 2011
Summary
Genome-wide selection (GWS) using ridge regression-best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) significantly improved prediction accuracy for maize flowering traits compared to marker-assisted selection (MAS). RR-BLUP offers a robust approach for genomic prediction in plant breeding.
Area of Science:
- Plant Breeding
- Genomics
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Marker-assisted selection (MAS) uses a subset of genetic markers, potentially missing quantitative trait loci (QTL) with small effects.
- Genome-wide selection (GWS) utilizes all available genetic markers for improved prediction of breeding values (BVs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prediction accuracy of GWS for three maize (Zea mays) flowering traits.
- To compare GWS performance against conventional marker-assisted selection (MAS).
Main Methods:
- Cross-validation experiments were conducted on a large dataset from 25 maize nested association mapping populations.
- Genome-wide selection was implemented using ridge regression-best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP).
- Comparison was made with composite interval mapping (CIM) and other GWS methods (BayesA, BayesB).
Main Results:
- RR-BLUP significantly outperformed MAS utilizing composite interval mapping (CIM) for predicting maize flowering traits.
- RR-BLUP demonstrated prediction accuracies comparable to or greater than BayesA and BayesB.
- Prediction accuracy with RR-BLUP increased with training sample proportion, marker density, and heritability, eventually reaching a plateau.
Conclusions:
- GWS, particularly RR-BLUP, offers superior prediction accuracy for complex traits in maize compared to traditional MAS.
- RR-BLUP is a preferred method for estimating marker effects in GWS, showing robustness across various factors.
- Gains in accuracy with RR-BLUP over CIM were generally larger when training sample proportion, marker density, and heritability were lower.
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Frequency-dependent Selection
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.

