Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

Clinical Anthropometrics and Body Composition from 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2024
Customized versus population-based growth curves: prediction of low body fat percent at term corrected gestational
Tameeka L Law1, Lakshmi D Katikaneni, Sarah N Taylor
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. tllaw@hotmail.com
Insights
Customized growth curves better identify preterm infants who are small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and have lower body fat percent (BF%). This approach offers improved differentiation compared to standard population-based curves.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal research
- Pediatric growth assessment
- Body composition analysis
Background:
- Accurate identification of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) preterm infants is crucial for clinical management.
- Standard population-based growth curves may not adequately represent individual growth potential in preterm populations.
- Body fat percent (BF%) is an important indicator of nutritional status and long-term health outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of customized versus population-based growth curves in identifying SGA and low body fat percent (BF%) in preterm infants.
- To assess the predictive value of different growth curve methods for body composition at term corrected gestational age.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 204 preterm infants.
- Infants were classified as SGA or appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) using both population-based and customized growth curves.
- Body fat percent (BF%) was measured using air-displacement plethysmography; statistical analyses included regression models.
Main Results:
- Customized curves reclassified 30% of preterm infants, identifying more SGA infants.
- SGA infants identified exclusively by customized curves had significantly lower BF% compared to AGA infants.
- Customized growth curves were a significant predictor of BF% (p=0.02), unlike population-based curves (p=0.50).
Conclusions:
- Customized growth potential assessment provides superior differentiation of SGA infants with low body fat percent in preterm populations.
- This individualized approach enhances the identification of growth abnormalities compared to standard population-based growth curves.
Objective:
Compare customized versus population-based growth curves for identification of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and body fat percent (BF%) among preterm infants.
Methods:
Prospective cohort study of 204 preterm infants classified as SGA or appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) by population-based and customized growth curves. BF% was determined by air-displacement plethysmography. Differences between groups were compared using bivariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses.
Results:
Customized curves reclassified 30% of the preterm infants as SGA. SGA infants identified by customized method only had significantly lower BF% (13.8 ± 6.0) than the AGA (16.2 ± 6.3, p = 0.02) infants and similar to the SGA infants classified by both methods (14.6 ± 6.7, p = 0.51). Customized growth curves were a significant predictor of BF% (p = 0.02), whereas population-based growth curves were not a significant independent predictor of BF% (p = 0.50) at term corrected gestational age.
Conclusion:
Customized growth potential improves the differentiation of SGA infants and low BF% compared with a standard population-based growth curve among a cohort of preterm infants.
Related Concept Videos
Population Growth
Regression Toward the Mean
Modeling with Differential Equations
Derivatives: Problem Solving
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Signs of Puberty