Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 22, 2026

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Neural Coding and Mechanisms of Visual Processing in the Superior Colliculus
Published on: April 21, 2023
Spatial interactions in the superior colliculus predict saccade behavior in a neural field model.
Robert A Marino1, Thomas P Trappenberg, Michael Dorris
1Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Top-down and bottom-up signals interact in the superior colliculus (SCi) to control eye movements. A dynamic winner-take-all model shows how these interactions influence saccadic reaction times (SRT) by altering signal properties.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Computational Neuroscience
- Vision Science
Background:
- Eye movements are controlled by top-down (goal-related) and bottom-up (stimulus-related) neural signals.
- These signals converge in the superior colliculus intermediate layers (SCi), a midbrain structure crucial for saccades.
- The precise interaction of these signals within the SCi map and their influence on saccadic behavior is actively debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the spatial interaction of top-down (TD) and bottom-up (BU) signals within a computational model of the SCi.
- To understand how these interactions influence saccadic reaction time (SRT).
Main Methods:
- Developed a two-dimensional dynamic winner-take-all neural field model of the SCi.
- Used physiological measurements of population activity on the SC map to inform model parameters.
- Simulated interactions by manipulating signal size, magnitude, number, and spatial separation.
Main Results:
- The model demonstrated nonlinear interactions between TD and BU signals within the SCi map.
- These interactions influenced SRT by altering spatial extent, peak magnitude, number, and separation of signals.
- The model successfully reproduced and reconciled inconsistencies in previous behavioral studies on TD and BU influences on SRT.
- Showed how spatial interactions can lead to either increases or decreases in SRT depending on experimental conditions.
Conclusions:
- Dynamic two-dimensional winner-take-all modeling with local excitation and distal inhibition accurately reflects SCi physiological activity.
- This modeling approach accounts for observed behavioral changes in SRT resulting from TD and BU signal manipulations.
- The findings provide a framework for understanding how neural signal interactions in the SCi govern saccadic eye movements.
More Related Videos
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019
05:44Using Saccadometry with Deep Brain Stimulation to Study Normal and Pathological Brain Function
Published on: July 14, 2016