Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 29, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Randomized clinical trial of rapid versus 24-hour rehydration for children with acute gastroenteritis
Colin V E Powell1, Stephen J Priestley, Simon Young
1Departments of aEmergency Medicine, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Insights
Rapid nasogastric rehydration (RNR) and standard nasogastric rehydration (SNR) showed similar primary efficacy in treating children with acute viral gastroenteritis. RNR reduced hospitalizations but had a higher rate of failed ED discharges.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Acute viral gastroenteritis is a common cause of dehydration in children.
- Nasogastric rehydration is a key intervention for managing moderate dehydration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of rapid nasogastric rehydration (RNR) versus standard nasogastric rehydration (SNR) in pediatric patients.
- To evaluate treatment failure rates and clinical outcomes for two nasogastric rehydration regimens.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving children aged 6-72 months with moderate dehydration due to acute viral gastroenteritis.
- Patients received either RNR (4 hours in ED) or SNR (24 hours in ward).
- Primary and secondary treatment failures were assessed.
Main Results:
- Primary treatment failure rates were similar between RNR (11.8%) and SNR (9.2%).
- Secondary treatment failure was significantly lower with RNR (30.3%) compared to SNR (44%).
- RNR led to fewer hospitalizations, but approximately 23% of RNR patients failed discharge from the ED.
Conclusions:
- Both RNR and SNR demonstrate comparable primary efficacy and clinical outcomes for pediatric acute viral gastroenteritis.
- RNR effectively reduces the need for hospitalization but requires careful consideration of ED discharge success.
- Further research may optimize RNR protocols to improve ED discharge success rates.
Objective:
To compare the efficacy of 2 nasogastric rehydration regimens for children with acute viral gastroenteritis.
Methods:
Children 6 to 72 months of age with acute viral gastroenteritis and moderate dehydration were recruited from emergency departments (EDs) at 2 metropolitan, pediatric, teaching hospitals. After clinical assessment of the degree of dehydration, patients were assigned randomly to receive either standard nasogastric rehydration (SNR) over 24 hours in the hospital ward or rapid nasogastric rehydration (RNR) over 4 hours in the ED. Primary (>2% weight loss, compared with the admission weight) and secondary treatment failures were assessed.
Results:
Of 9331 children with acute gastroenteritis who were screened, 254 children were assigned randomly to receive either RNR (n = 132 [52.0%]) or SNR (n = 122 [48.0%]). Baseline characteristics for the 2 groups were similar. All patients made a full recovery without severe adverse events. The primary failure rates were similar for RNR (11.8% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0%-17.6%]) and SNR (9.2% [95% CI: 3.7%-14.7%]; P = .52). Secondary treatment failure was more common in the SNR group (44% [95% CI: 34.6%-53.4%]) than in the RNR group (30.3% [95% CI: 22.5%-38.8%]; P = .03). Discharge from the ED after RNR failed for 27 patients (22.7%), and another 9 (7.6%) were readmitted to the hospital within 24 hours.
Conclusions:
Primary treatment failure and clinical outcomes were similar for RNR and SNR. Although RNR generally reduced the need for hospitalization, discharge home from the ED failed for approximately one-fourth of the patients.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Bacterial Gastroenteritis
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
