Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cell Motility through Blebbing01:16

Cell Motility through Blebbing

Blebs are a type of membrane protrusion formed by the internal hydrostatic pressure of the cytoplasm. Blebs are observed in several cell types, including fibroblasts, immune cells, and single-celled organisms like the amoeba. The primary function of blebs is cell locomotion and apoptosis, but they are also found during necrosis and cell division. The life cycle of a bleb comprises an initiation phase followed by the expansion and retraction phases.
Blebbing Through the Matrix
In multicellular...
Formation of Muscle Fibers from Myoblasts01:13

Formation of Muscle Fibers from Myoblasts

De novo myogenesis, or the formation of muscle fibers, begins during the early embryonic stages. The skeletal muscle is formed from somites– blocks of embryonic cell layers. The somites are further divided into dermatomes, myotomes, sclerotomes, and syndetomes. Among these, the myotomes give rise to muscle fibers.
Muscle progenitor cells (MPCs) are formed from the myotomes. MPCs express genes that encode the transcription factors Pax3 and Pax7. Along with Pax 3/7, other transcription factors...
Microscopic Anatomy of Skeletal Muscles01:13

Microscopic Anatomy of Skeletal Muscles

Skeletal muscle cells, also called muscle fibers, are distinctly elongated, multi-nucleated, slender biological units. They are packed with specialized structures designed to facilitate their primary function, which is contraction.
The muscle sarcolemma is a plasma membrane enclosing each muscle cell that conducts electrical signals called action potentials. The sarcolemma extends into the cell to form T-tubules, ensuring the neural impulses are uniformly distributed across the entire muscle...
The Role of Actin and Myosin in Non-muscle Cells01:10

The Role of Actin and Myosin in Non-muscle Cells

Actin and myosin or actomyosin filaments also play a significant role in cells other than those involved in muscle contraction (which occurs within the sarcomere of muscle cells). The mechanism of non-muscle cell contractile bundles was first observed in Dictyostelium and Acanthamoeba. In non-muscle cells, two bundles are commonly found: stress fibers and actomyosin adherence belts. These contractile bundles are smaller and less organized than the ones found in muscle cells. They  are held...
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments01:12

Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments

The cytoskeleton is a complex dynamic structure performing varied functions based on cellular requirements. The adaptability of the individual filaments in the cytoskeleton determines their ability to perform various functions within the cell. It can undergo rapid reorganization during processes like cell division or remain stable for several hours as in the interphase. The adaptability of these filaments depends on stringent regulatory mechanisms. The microfilament and microtubules of the...
Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces01:13

Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces

In animal cells, the extracellular matrix allows cells within tissues to withstand external stresses and transmits signals from the outside of the cell to the inside. The extracellular matrix is extensive, and its composition varies between different types of tissues. For example, the reticular fibers and ground substance make up the ECM in loose connective tissue, while collagen and bone minerals make up the ECM of bone tissue. 
Anchoring junctions mechanically attach a cell to the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A robotic wound care patient for evidence-based surgical site infection research.

Journal of tissue viability·2026
Same author

Moisture-Responsive Friction Adaptability: Rethinking the Conventional Skin Silicone Interfaces in Pressure Injury Prevention Dressing Designs.

International wound journal·2026
Same author

Moisture-Responsive Thermal Conductivity Properties of Hydrofiber Versus Polyurethane Foam: Implications for Pressure Injury Prevention.

International wound journal·2026
Same author

Be there or be square: Should we adopt non-rectangular dressing shapes in single-use negative pressure wound therapy?

Journal of tissue viability·2025
Same author

The Protective Efficacy of a New Soft Silicone Multi-Layer Dressing in Reducing the Heel Pressure Ulcer Risk.

International wound journal·2025
Same author

Rheological Assessment for Determining Form Stability of Wound Dressings.

International wound journal·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 29, 2026

A Novel Stretching Platform for Applications in Cell and Tissue Mechanobiology
16:46

A Novel Stretching Platform for Applications in Cell and Tissue Mechanobiology

Published on: June 3, 2014

Cell-to-cell variability in deformations across compressed myoblasts.

Noa Slomka1, Amit Gefen

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
|September 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Cell geometry significantly impacts how localized mechanical stress affects the plasma membrane (PM) and nuclear surface area (NSA). Understanding these cell-specific mechanical responses is crucial for interpreting cellular responses to external forces.

More Related Videos

In Vitro Differentiation of Mature Myofibers for Live Imaging
08:12

In Vitro Differentiation of Mature Myofibers for Live Imaging

Published on: January 7, 2017

Methods to Assess Subcellular Compartments of Muscle in C. elegans
10:13

Methods to Assess Subcellular Compartments of Muscle in C. elegans

Published on: November 13, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 29, 2026

A Novel Stretching Platform for Applications in Cell and Tissue Mechanobiology
16:46

A Novel Stretching Platform for Applications in Cell and Tissue Mechanobiology

Published on: June 3, 2014

In Vitro Differentiation of Mature Myofibers for Live Imaging
08:12

In Vitro Differentiation of Mature Myofibers for Live Imaging

Published on: January 7, 2017

Methods to Assess Subcellular Compartments of Muscle in C. elegans
10:13

Methods to Assess Subcellular Compartments of Muscle in C. elegans

Published on: November 13, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cellular Mechanobiology
  • Biophysics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Cellular responses to mechanical forces are often localized, not uniform.
  • Individual cell geometry, like nuclear size and surface curvature, influences these localized deformations.
  • Variability exists even within cell populations, complicating mechanical response analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify cell-to-cell variability in localized tensile strains within the plasma membrane (PM) and nuclear surface area (NSA) of compressed myoblasts.
  • To compare the mechanical performance and strain patterns across individual cells.
  • To understand how cell geometry influences mechanical strain distribution.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and utilized a confocal microscopy-based, 3D cell-specific finite element modeling (FEM) approach.
  • Modeled five individual C2C12 undifferentiated myoblasts from the same culture.
  • Simulated compression and calculated tensile strains in the PM and NSA, along with variability metrics.

Main Results:

  • Significant cell-to-cell variability (coefficient of variation up to ~35%) was observed in tensile strains across the PM and NSA.
  • Smaller external compressions induced greater variability in intracellular strains compared to larger deformations.
  • External deformations required to exceed specific strain thresholds were remarkably consistent across different cells.

Conclusions:

  • Cell geometry introduces significant variability in localized mechanical strain responses within a cell population.
  • Despite variability in strain magnitudes, cells exhibit similar thresholds for localized plasma membrane and nuclear surface area strain.
  • Understanding cell-specific mechanical variability is vital for interpreting experimental data in mechanobiology.